1. Trang chủ
  2. » Kỹ Thuật - Công Nghệ

Frontiers of Radiation Therapy and Oncology Vol. 34 doc

200 274 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 200
Dung lượng 4,36 MB

Nội dung

Three-Dimensional Radiation Treatment Frontiers of Radiation Therapy and Oncology Vol 34 Series Editors John L Meyer, San Francisco, Calif W Hinkelbein, Berlin Symposium on 3-D Radiation Treatment: Technological Innovations and Clinical Results, Munich, Germany, March 24 – 27, 1999 Three-Dimensional Radiation Treatment Technological Innovations and Clinical Results Volume Editors H.J Feldmann, Fulda P Kneschaurek, Munich M Molls, Munich 37 figures, in color, and 30 tables, 2000 Frontiers of Radiation Therapy and Oncology Founded 1968 by J.M Vaeth, San Francisco, Calif Prof Dr H.J Feldmann, Fulda Klinik fu Radioonkologie-Strahlentherapie, Klinikum Fulda, Fulda ăr Prof Dr P Kneschaurek, Munich Prof Dr M Molls, Munich Klinik und Poliklinik fu Strahlentherapie und Radiologische Onkologie der ¨r Technischen Universitat Mu ¨nchen, Klinikum rechts der lsar, Mu ¨nchen ¨ Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Bibliographic Indices This publication is listed in bibliographic services, including Current ContentsÔ and Index Medicus Drug Dosage The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any change in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug All rights reserved No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher Ó Copyright 2000 by S Karger AG, P.O Box, CH–4009 Basel (Switzerland) www.karger.com Printed in Switzerland on acid-free paper by Reinhardt Druck, Basel ISSN 0071–9676 ISBN 3–8055–6947–5 Contents IX Preface Feldmann, H.J (Fulda); Kneschaurek, P.; Molls, M (Munich) Essentials of Conformal Radiotherapy Significance of Local Tumor Control Gerard, J.P.; Roy, P (Pierre-Benite); Cucherat, M.; Leizerowicz, A (Lyon) ´ ´ Mechanisms in the Development of Normal Tissue Damage – Fiction and Facts Trott, K.R (London) 17 Epidermal Growth Factor and Its Receptor in Tumor Response to Radiation Milas, L (Houston, Tex.) 26 New Technologies in Conformal Radiation Therapy Schlegel, W (Heidelberg) Principles of Conformal Radiotherapy 40 Intensity-Modulated Stereotactic Radiosurgery Mohan, R.; Cardinale, R.M.; Wu, Q.; Benedict, S (Richmond, Va.) 49 Three-Dimensional Endovascular Brachytherapy Quast, U.; Fluhs, D.; Bambynek, M.; Baumgart, D.; von Birgelen, C (Essen) ă 59 New Tools of Brachytherapy Based on Three-Dimensional Imaging Baltas, D.; Milickovic, N.; Giannouli, S (Offenbach, Athens); Lahanas, M.; Kolotas, C (Offenbach); Zamboglou, N (Offenbach, Athens) Three-Dimensional Lung – State of the Art and Future Perspectives 71 Lung Cancer – Radiotherapy in Combined-Modality Schedules Stuschke, M (Berlin); Pottgen, C (Essen) ă 80 Modified Fractionation in the Radical Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Baumann, M.; Appold, S.; Zips, D (Dresden); Nestle, U (Homburg/Saar); Petersen, C.; Herrmann, T (Dresden) 89 Target Volume Definition and Locoregional Failure in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Rube, C.; Nestle, U (Homburg/Saar) ă Three-Dimensional Brain State of the Art and Future Perspectives 97 PET and SPECT in Three-Dimensional Treatment Planning of Brain Gliomas Grosu, A.L.; Weber, W (Munich); Feldmann, H.J (Fulda) 106 Radiation Dose Escalation for the Treatment of Gliomas: Recent Experience Fitzek, M.M (Berlin) 116 Three-Dimensional Brachytherapy in Malignant Gliomas Kolotas, C.; Birn, G.; Hey, S.; Strassmann, G.; Martin, T.; Vogt, H.-G.; ´ Baltas, D.; Zamboglou, N (Offenbach) 123 Fractionated Radiotherapy of Inoperable Meningiomas without Histological Verification: Long-Term Results in 59 Patients Debus, J.; Wundrich, M.; Pirzkall, A.; Hoess, A.; Schulz-Ertner, D.; ă Engenhart-Cabillic, R.; Wannenmacher, M (Heidelberg) 130 Modern Management of Brain Metastases: Prognostic Factors in Radiosurgery Becker, G.; Jeremic, B.; Kortmann, R.D.; Bamberg, M (Tubingen) ă Conformal Radiation Therapy of Prostate Cancer – Techniques, Outcomes, Pitfalls 145 Adjuvant Radiotherapy following Radical Prostatectomy Wiegel, T (Berlin) 152 Morbidity following Radiation Therapy Three-Dimensional versus Two-Dimensional Radiation Therapy, Treatment Planning and Treatment Delivery to the Prostate, Seminal Vesicles, and Pelvic Lymph Nodes Lahaniatis, J.E.; Brady, L.W.; Brutus, R.A (Philadelphia, Pa.) 158 Dose Escalation with External-Beam Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer Sandler, H.W (Ann Arbor, Mich.) Contents VI 165 Prostate Cancer – Combination of Hormonal Ablation and Conformal Therapy Feldmann, H.J (Fulda); Stoll, P.; Geinitz, H.; Zimmermann, F.B (Munich) 177 Value of Dose-Volume Histograms in Estimating Rectal Bleeding after Conformal Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer Geinitz, H.; Zimmermann, F.B.; Stoll, P (Munich); Narkwong, L (Munich/Bangkok); Kneschaurek, P.; Busch, R.; Kuzmany, A.; Molls, M (Munich) 186 Author Index 187 Subject Index Contents VII Preface Major advances have been accomplished in recent years in conformal and stereotactic techniques, dosimetry as well as in target volume concepts, and clinical studies have been performed This peer-reviewed volume of Frontiers of Radiation Therapy and Oncology includes a selection of the important topics discussed at the meeting on ‘3-D Radiation Treatment: Technological Innovations and Clinical Results’ which was organized by the Department of Radiation-Oncology of the Technical University of Munich and focused on conformal and stereotactic radiotherapy in the treatment of tumors The papers published in this volume emphasize the significance of local tumor control, mechanisms of normal tissue damage, report new technologies in conformal radiation therapy, dynamic intensity modulation and three-dimensional endovascular brachytherapy They also describe new tools of threedimensional brachytherapy and analyze clinical results in the treatment of lung cancer, brain tumors and prostate cancer This book aims at making this new information available to biologists, physicists, radiation oncologists and clinicians It updates currently available information, provides a comprehensive overview of the field and suggests future directions H.J Feldmann, Fulda P Kneschaurek, M Molls, Munich IX Essentials of Conformal Radiotherapy Feldmann HJ, Kneschaurek P, Molls M (eds): Three-Dimensional Radiation Treatment Technological Innovations and Clinical Results Front Radiat Ther Oncol Basel, Karger, 2000, vol 34, pp 1–7 Significance of Local Tumor Control J.P Gerard a, P Roy b, M Cucherat c, A Leizerowicz c ´ a b c Service de Radiotherapie-Oncologie, and ´ Service de Biostatistique, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Benite, and ´ Service de Pharmacologie Clinique, UFR Laennec, Lyon, France The Natural History of Cancer Is Still Based on a Cellular Concept Modern biology techniques have brought new understandings into the field of gene functioning and subcellular pathways Cancer is now considered as a multifactorial and multistep process leading to alteration of oncogenes and antioncogenes resulting in a malignant genotype Conversely, in clinical practice, cancer is still seen as a cellular process, usually of monoclonal origin Starting from one or a few malignant cells, the cellular clone progressively grows into a primary gross tumor One of the key points of cancer disease is the ability of cancer cells to migrate and generate distant metastases which are often fatal: the UICC TNM classification clearly reflects this double aspect of cancer with a primary tumor ‘T’ and lymphatic or organ metastases ‘N’ or ‘M’ Local control of cancer consists primarily in the eradication of all cancer cells in the primary tumor ‘T’ (and neighboring lymph nodes) From the first cancer cells, which are usually undetectable, the natural history of cancer can be divided into two steps The subclinical phase, when there are less than 109 cells, is clinically silent The second phase starts when clinical symptoms or a gross tumor are apparent It is usually shorter than the subclinical phase If not treated, the cancer will lead to death in a few months or years when the tumor mass is close to 1012 cells [1, 2] The Cure of Cancer Is a Reality: It Makes Sense to Give Treatment with a Curative Intent When, after radical treatment and complete disappearance of all cancerous lesions, a patient remains free of disease for 20 or 30 years, the clinician Feldmann HJ, Kneschaurek P, Molls M (eds): Three-Dimensional Radiation Treatment Technological Innovations and Clinical Results Front Radiat Ther Oncol Basel, Karger, 2000, vol 34, pp 177–185 Value of Dose-Volume Histograms in Estimating Rectal Bleeding after Conformal Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer Hans Geinitz a, Frank Bodo Zimmermann a, Peter Stoll a, Ladawon Narkwong a, c, Peter Kneschaurek a, Raymonde Busch b, Alexander Kuzmany a, Michael Molls a a b c Klinik und Poliklinik fur Strahlentherapie und Radiologische Onkologie, ă Institut fur Medizinische Statistik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitat ă ă Munchen, Germany, and ă Radiation Oncology Division, Vajira Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand Radiation therapy is an effective treatment of prostate cancer Since local control improves with increasing tumor dose [1], many centers are involved in dose escalation studies for prostate cancer [2–5] With modern conformal radiation therapy, dose escalation seems to be feasible without a significant increase in toxicity [2, 3, 5, 6] Nevertheless, the rectum remains the dose-limiting organ: a mostly moderate rectal bleeding occurs in 6–40% of the treated patients, and its frequency depends on the applied dose and the irradiated volume [2, 6–11] Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the organs at risk, as an integral part of three-dimensional treatment planning, seem to be valuable in predicting the risk of late radiation side effects They offer the chance of adapting the treatment concept before initiating radiation therapy and thus help avoid major late side effects This becomes particularly important when the dose to target volume is further escalated The purpose of this paper is to discuss the value of rectal DVHs in predicting rectal bleeding after conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer Our own data on the influence of rectal contouring on the association of DVH parameters with rectal bleeding are presented Studies on the Value of Rectal Dose-Volume Histogram Parameters to Predict Rectal Bleeding Hartford et al [8] studied 41 patients who were treated with a combination of photons (50.4 Gy to the pelvis) and protons (25.2 Gy to the prostate and seminal vesicles) to a total dose of 75.6 cobalt gray equivalents (CGE) Followup was at least years The anterior rectal wall was contoured extending from the anus to cm above the prostate The significance of certain dose-volume combinations (e.g 70 CGE to 60% of the anterior rectal wall) was tested to predict rectal bleeding 10 of 128 tested dose-volume combinations proved to discriminate statistically significantly between 14 patients with and 27 patients without rectal bleeding Boersma et al [2] subjected 130 patients with localized prostate carcinoma to conformal radiotherapy with photons according to the ‘simultaneous boost technique’ The pelvis was treated simultaneously with the planning target volume (PTV), but received only 64% of the dose through partial-transmission shielding blocks Dose to the PTV was 70–78 Gy DVHs of the whole rectal wall were generated, extending from 1.5 cm below the prostate to the start of the sigmoid colon Minimum follow-up was 10 months Four dose-volume combinations were identified that could distinguish statistically significantly between patients with severe rectal bleeding (requiring laser treatment or blood transfusion) and 126 patients without severe rectal bleeding If the data in this study were analyzed according to the methods used in the work of Hartford et al [8], no significant dose-volume combinations could be found Furthermore, there was no significant correlation between any of the dosevolume parameters and the incidence of actuarial late gastrointestinal complicationsPgrade II Dale et al [12] applied the Lyman-Kutcher model to the DVHs of the whole rectum and the rectal wall (length 75–80 mm) of 52 patients treated conformally for prostate cancer The estimated probabilities for normal tissue complications correlated significantly with the score of a 6-item questionnaire addressing late rectal toxicity including rectal bleeding Mean dose to the PTV (prostate, seminal vesicles and a 2-cm safety margin) was 66 Gy applied by a four-field box technique Jackson et al [9] presented an abstract with the data of 132 patients treated conformally for prostate cancer Minimum target doses were 70.2 Gy (n>46) or 75.6 Gy (n>86) applied using a 6-field coplanar technique The most significant variables associated with bleeding (35 of 132 patients) were the percent volume of the rectal wall that received more than 50% of the prescription dose and the total rectal wall volume The exact definition of the cranio-caudal extension of the contoured rectal wall was not stated Geinitz et al 178 Factors Influencing the Predictive Value of Rectal Dose-Volume Histogram Parameters The data published in the literature demonstrate that there is an association of rectal DVH parameters and rectal bleeding after conformal therapy of prostate cancer Nevertheless, the fact that the cut-off values of one study population are not transposable to another population [2, 8] indicates that there are difficulties and uncertainties in generating and interpreting rectal DVHs They are discussed in the following section Contouring Before creating a DVH, the organ at risk has to be delineated The organ contour may vary among different observers (interobserver variability) and even for the same observer if the same organ is redrawn after a certain time interval For the prostate and seminal vesicles, Fiorino et al [13] found an interobserver variability of up to 18% when the organs were contoured by different physicians Lebesque et al [14] reported a drawing accuracy of 3% for the outer rectum contour (‘whole rectum’) and of 7% for the rectal wall when the structures were redrawn by the same physician Moreover, the volume calculations differ substantially when various treatment planning systems are used: Fellner et al [15] reported that the calculated volume of a cylindrical phantom could be 31% smaller or 15% larger than the true volume depending on what kind of planning system was used Organ Structures, Cranio-Caudal Borders So far, there is no consensus in the literature on what rectal structures should be delineated when creating a rectal DVH: the whole rectum [12, 14, 16, 17], the rectal wall [2, 9, 12, 14], the anterior rectal wall [8], or the rectal surface [18] are mentioned Besides, the cranio-caudal extension of the organ varies among work groups, predominantly because it is difficult to define the cranial border in CT scans Hence, the caudal and especially the cranial rectal borders are chosen more or less arbitrarily They are either set in relation to the anatomy of the intestine (i.e anus to horizontal course of the rectum) and/or in relation to the extension of the prostate (i.e anus to cm above the upper border of the prostate) and/or in relation to the treatment portals [2, 8, 16, 19, 20] In a first evaluation, we analyzed 12 of our patients who had definitive conformal irradiation, for prostate cancer The rectum was outlined using four different cranio-caudal borders for each patient Depending on how the rectal borders were defined, the percent rectal volume that received at least 90% of the prescribed dose varied by as much as 63% [21] Dose-Volume Histograms and Rectal Bleeding 179 Organ Movement and Set-Up Deviations Changes in the filling of the rectum and the bladder can lead to internal organ movement of the rectum [14, 19, 22] Melian et al [19] evaluated the organ shift in patients with prostate cancer by performing additional CT scans during radiation therapy [19] They observed differences in the rectal wall dose of up to 32% as compared to the initial value from the first planning CT scan Lebesque et al [14] observed a trend to a declining rectal filling in 11 patients with prostate cancer during the course of therapy The rectal volume in the planning CT scan that received at least 80% of the prescribed dose was on the average 14% higher than the values obtained from the CT scans on weeks 2, and If the rectal wall was contoured instead of the whole rectum, the difference was only 5% In addition to organ movement, set-up deviations contribute to changes in rectum position in relation to the treatment portals Consequently, the DVH data on the basis of just one planing CT scan before therapy not necessarily reflect the true dose distribution in the rectum during fractionated therapy that lasts up to more than weeks Comorbidity The dose to the rectum and the irradiated volume are possibly not the only factors responsible for late rectal toxicity Concomitant diseases, such as cardiovascular disease or diabetes mellitus, are likely to influence the frequency and the onset of late radiation toxicity [23–27] Furthermore, individual radiation sensitivity may play a more or less extensive role in the occurrence of late radiation side effects With regard to all these confounding factors, not all patients with a high risk of late rectal complications are likely to be detected on the basis of DVH parameters alone Dose-Volume Histogram Parameters and Rectal Bleeding: Munich Data To obtain further insight into the influence of contouring on the association between DVH parameters and rectal bleeding, we analyzed 20 of our patients who were treated with definitive conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer Patients In patients who had definitive conformal irradiation for prostate cancer at our institution, the frequency of clinically apparent rectal bleeding was 19% (37 of 195 patients with Geinitz et al 180 a minimum follow-up of 12 months) In most cases, bleeding was minor, not requiring any major therapy and not disturbing the patients’ quality of daily life Twenty patients who all had been prescribed the same dose to the prostate and seminal vesicles were retrospectively analyzed: 10 patients (group 1) with moderate (grade II) rectal bleeding and 10 patients (group 2) without rectal bleeding or any other kind of late rectal toxicity Follow-up in the group without rectal bleeding was at least 30 months Median follow-up of all 20 patients was 37 months (23–50 months) Eight patients in group and patients in group received short-term neoadjuvant hormonal therapy Age and concomitant disease were well balanced in both groups: median age was 74.5 years (67–78 years) in group and 72 years (61–75 years) in group The frequency of cardiovascular disease was 5/10 in group and 6/10 in group One patient in group and no patient in group suffered from diabetes mellitus In group 2, bleeding occurred 3–26 months (median months) after the end of radiation therapy Bleeding lasted between and 40 months Seven patients had persistent rectal bleeding on the day of their last follow-up None of the patients required transfusions or laser coagulation Rectoscopy or coloscopy was performed in all of the patients in group after rectal bleeding had started It typically revealed contact-sensitive telangiectases in the distal rectum Other reasons for rectal bleeding were excluded Radiation Technique All the patients received a dose of 50 Gy to the prostate and seminal vesicles (plan 1), and an additional boost of 20 Gy to the prostate alone (plan 2) Fractionation was Gy daily, times per week Median overall treatment time was 51 days (48–65 days) The dose was prescribed according to the ICRU 50 guidelines The prostate and seminal vesicles were treated with a 4-field box technique (ap, pa, and lat-lat) in all patients The boost was delivered either with the same box technique (6 patients, in each group) or via oblique noncoplanar fields (gantry angles of 70º, 100º, 260º and 290º; patients) Five patients were treated with the latter boost technique, but with slightly modified gantry angles The safety margins between the clinical target volume (e.g the prostate) and the planning target volume were 1.2 cm in the dorsal and 1.5 cm in all other directions during the first 50 Gy, and they were and 1.2 cm, respectively, during boost irradiation Planning and dose calculation were done with a Helax planing system using the TMS software Plan and plan were combined to a single plan for each patient, the DVHs of the rectum were then calculated for the combined plan Dose-Volume Histograms CT scans of the pelvis were taken in 5-mm slice thickness and 5-mm intervals In each CT slice, the outer contour of the rectum (‘whole rectum’), the total rectal wall, the anterior rectal wall and the posterior rectal wall were delineated by one of the authors Due to limitations of the TMS software, a little unmarked area was left when contouring the rectal wall [12] We then generated DVHs using different sets of lower and upper rectal borders for each of the contoured organs at risk (i.e for the whole rectum, the rectal wall, the anterior rectal wall, and the posterior rectal wall): border set extended from the anus to the lower border of the sigmoid colon (the lower border of the sigmoid colon was defined as the point where the colon turned horizontally) Border set extended from the anus to the plane between the upper border of both acetabula Border set extended from the anus to cm above the upper prostate border, and border set extended from 1.5 cm below the prostate apex to the sigmoid colon The matrix for dose calculation was: 281¶281 to 2,000¶2,000 Dose-Volume Histograms and Rectal Bleeding 181 Fig Box plot graphs of absolute volume fractions of the anterior rectal wall, that received at least 80% of the reference dose (aV80), for bleeding and nonbleeding patients (border set 4) The median value (horizontal line within the ‘box’), the 50% confidence interval (the ‘box’), the 95% confidence intervals (the ‘whiskers’) and the range (circles or end of the ‘whiskers’) are demonstrated calculation points for the whole rectum, 97¶97 to 400¶400 calculation points for the total rectal wall, 47¶47 to 228¶228 calculation points for the anterior rectal wall and 55¶55 to 198¶198 calculation points for the posterior rectal wall Additionally, we analyzed rectal DVHs previously created by various radiation oncologists during the original planning of the patients The physicians had contoured the whole rectum without a strictly defined caudal or cranial rectal border Thus 340 DVHs were investigated in total (17 per patient) For each DVH, we compared the percent (V50, V80, V95) and the absolute (aV50, aV80, aV95) volume fractions that received more than 50, 80 and 95% of the reference dose, respectively Statistics Variables were tested for differences in distribution between bleeding and nonbleeding patients applying the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test Values below 5% were considered to be significant Results Age, size of the PTV of plans and 2, the prostate volume and the combined volume of the prostate and seminal vesicles revealed no differences in distribution between bleeding and nonbleeding patients Bleeding patients had significantly higher absolute volume fractions (aV50, aV80 and aV95) for all rectal border sets when the whole rectum or the anterior rectal wall were contoured (p between =0.001 and 0.035) The aV80 of the anterior rectal wall reached the lowest p value (p=0.001 for border set 2, border set and border set 4, p>0.002 for border set 1, fig 1) Geinitz et al 182 There was also a good association with bleeding for the aV50 and the aV80 of the whole rectum for all rectal border sets (p between 0.002 and 0.009) Furthermore, the aV50 and aV80 of the whole rectum contoured by different physicians during the original planning procedure were highly significant (p>0.007 and p>0.005, respectively) When the whole rectal wall was contoured, the aV50 and aV80 were significantly associated with bleeding for all rectal border sets (p between 0.002 and 0.035), whereas the aV95 showed significance only with border set None of the volume fractions of the posterior rectal wall were associated with rectal bleeding The percent volume fractions V50, V80 and V95 showed no significant differences in distribution between bleeding and nonbleeding patients for all contoured parts of the rectum There was no cut-off value of any of the DVH parameters that could separate 100% between bleeding and nonbleeding patients For each applied organ at risk and each border set there is considerable overlap between bleeding patients and nonbleeding patients When the whole rectum was contoured, a V80 values of more than 32 cm3 appeared exclusively in patients with rectal bleeding (6 of 10 patients), regardless of how the cranial and caudal rectal borders were defined Discussion The data indicate that the association between rectal DVH parameters and rectal bleeding depends on how the rectum is contoured in the planning CT scans Primarily, it seems to be of importance what structures are delineated in the scan: the whole rectum, the total rectal wall, the anterior rectal wall or the posterior rectal wall In our group of patients, the association between DVH parameters and rectal bleeding is stronger when the anterior rectal wall or the whole rectum are contoured than when the total rectal wall or the posterior rectal wall are delineated In fact, none of the DVH parameters of the posterior rectal wall correlated with rectal bleeding Secondly, the definition of the cranial and caudal borders influences the association with bleeding, although not as much as the delineation of different organ structures In this study group, the association between DVH parameters of border sets and and rectal bleeding is little stronger than with the other border sets There was no cutoff value that could separate bleeding and nonbleeding patients with 100% certainty A very good separation was achievable by applying a value of 10 cm3 for the aV80 of the anterior rectal wall: 10/10 patients with rectal bleeding had higher values whereas only of 10 patients without rectal bleeding had an aV80 above 10 cm3 (border set 2–4) Dose-Volume Histograms and Rectal Bleeding 183 Conclusions Rectal DVHs seem to be a promising tool in predicting late rectal bleeding after conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer Nevertheless, there are some uncertainties in creating and interpreting rectal DVHs Apart from organ movement, setup deviations and comorbidity, different modes of contouring appear to bias the association between DVH parameters and rectal bleeding Since almost all groups utilize different definitions of the cranial and caudal rectal borders and since it is not yet clear whether it is best to delineate the whole rectum, the total rectal wall or the anterior rectal wall, it appears to be important for every center to define its own cutoff values A standard protocol in rectal contouring would facilitate the transposition of cutoff values from one study group to another Acknowledgment This work was supported by a grant from Deutsche Krebshilfe References Pollack A, Zagars GK: External radiotherapy dose response of prostate cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997;39:1011–1018 Boersma LJ, van den Brink M, Bruce AM, Shouman T, Gras L, te Velde A, Lebesque JV: Estimation of the incidence of late bladder and rectum complications after high-dose (70–78 Gy) conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer, using dose-volume histograms Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998; 41:83–92 Hanks GE, Hanlon A, Schultheiss TE, Hunt MA, Movsas B, Peter RS, Hanks GE: Dose escalation with 3D conformal treatment: Five-year outcomes, treatment optimization, and future directions Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998; 41:501–510 Sandler HM: 3-D conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer Front Radiat Ther Oncol 1996;29: 238–243 Zelefsky MJ, Leibl SA, Gaudin PB, Kutcher GJ, Fleshner NE, Venkatramen ES, Reuter VE, Fair WR, Ling CC, Fuks Z: Dose escalation with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy affects the outcome in prostate cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998;41:491–500 Sandler HM, McLaughlin PW, Ten Haken RK, Addison H, Forman J, Lichter A: Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: Low risk of chronic rectal morbidity observed in a large series of patients Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995;33:797–801 Hanlon AL, Schultheiss TE, Hunt MA, Movsas B, Peter RS, Hanks GE: Chronic rectal bleeding after high-dose conformal treatment of prostate cancer warrants modification of existing morbidity scales Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997;38:59–63 Hartford AC, Niemierko A, Adams JA, Urie MM, Shipley WU: Conformal irradiation of the prostate: Estimating long-term rectal bleeding risk using dose-volume histograms Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996;36:721–730 Jackson A, Zelefsky M, Cowan D, Venkatraman E, Skwarchuk M, Burman C, Kutcher G, Fuks Z, Leibel S, Ling CC: Rectal bleeding after conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer and dosevolume histograms Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998;42:217 Geinitz et al 184 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Teshima T, Hanks GE, Hanlon AL, Peter RS, Schultheiss TE: Rectal bleeding after conformal 3D treatment of prostate cancer: Time to occurrence, response to treatment and duration of therapy Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997;39:77–88 Schultheiss TE, Lee WR, Hunt MA, Hanlon AL, Peter RS, Hanks GE: Late GI and GU complications in the treatment of prostate cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997;37:3–11 Dale E, Olsen DR, Fossa SD: Normal tissue complication probabilities correlated with late effects in the rectum after prostate conformal radiotherapy Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999;43:385–391 Fiorino C, Reni M, Bolognesi A, Cattaneo GM, Calandrino R: Intra- and inter-observer variability in contouring prostate and seminal vesicles: Implications for conformal treatment planning Radiother Oncol 1998;47:285–292 Lebesque JV, Bruce AM, Kroes AP, Touw A, Shouman T, van Herk M: Variation in volumes, dosevolume histograms, and estimated normal tissue complication probabilities of rectum and bladder during conformal radiotherapy of T3 prostate cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995;33: 1109–1119 Fellner C, Sommer B, Siedhoff N, Potter R: Accuracy of calculation of volumes for the evaluation ă of dose-volume histograms Comparison of dierent treatment planning systems Strahlenther Onkol 1998;174:345–349 Fiorino C, Reni M, Cattaneo G, Bolognesi A, Calandrino R: Comparing 3-, 4- and 6-field techniques for conformal irradiation of prostate and seminal vesicles using dose-volume histograms Radiother Oncol 1997;44:251–257 Neal AJ, Oldham M, Dearnaley DP: Comparison of treatment techniques for conformal radiotherapy of the prostate using dose-volume histograms and normal tissue complication probabilities Radiother Oncol 1995;37:29–34 Lu Y, Li S, Spelbring D, Song P, Vijayakumar S, Pelizzari C, Chen GTY: Dose-surface histograms as treatment planning tool for prostate conformal therapy Med Phys 1995;22:279–284 Melian E, Mageras GS, Fuks Z, Leibel SA, Niehaus A, Lorant H, Zelefsky M, Baldwin B, Kutcher GJ: Variation in prostate position quantitation and implications for three-dimensional conformal treatment planning Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997;38:73–81 Pollack A, Zagars GK, Starkschall G, Childress CH, Kopplin S, Boyere AL, Rosen II: Conventional vs conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer preliminary results of dosimetry and acute toxicity Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996;34:555–564 Geinitz H, Zimmermann FB, Narkwong L, Kneschaurek P, Wehrmann R, Kuzmany A, Molls M: Prostate cancer: Problems in the interpretation of rectal dose-volume histograms Strahlenther Onkol 2000;176:168–172 Padhani AR, Khoo VS, Suckling J, Husband JE, Leach MO, Dearnaley DP: Evaluating the effect of rectal distension and rectal movement on prostate gland position using cine MRI Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999;44:525–533 Herold DM, Hanlon AL, Hanks GE: Diabetes mellitus: A predictor for late radiation morbidity Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999;43:475–479 Bohler FK, Rhomberg W, Doringer W: Hypertension as risk factor for radiation induced sideă eects in breast cancer Strahlenther Onkol 1992;168:344–349 Lauk S, Trott K-R: Radiation induced heart disease in hypertensive rats Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1988;14:109–114 Potish RA, Jones TK, Levitt SH: Factors predisposing to radiation-related small-bowel damage Radiology 1979;132:479–482 Schultz-Hector S, Kallfaß E, Sund M: Radiation related arterial injury Review of clinical and experimental data Strahlenther Onkol 1995;171:427436 ă Dr Hans Geinitz, Klinik und Poliklinik fur Strahlentherapie und ă Radiologische Onkologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitat Munchen, ă ă Ismaninger Strasse 22, D–81675 Munchen (Germany) Tel +49 89 41404501, Fax +49 89 41404882, E-Mail Hans.Geinitz@lrz.tu-muenchen.de Dose-Volume Histograms and Rectal Bleeding 185 Author Index Appold, S 80 Baltas, D 59, 116 Bamberg, M 130 Bambynek, M 49 Baumann, M 80 Baumgart, D 49 Becker, G 130 Benedict, S 40 Birn, G 116 Brady, L.W 152 Brutus, R.A 152 Busch, R 177 Cardinale, R.M 40 Cucherat, M Debus, J 123 Engenhart-Cabillic, R 123 Feldmann, H.J 97, 165 Fitzek, M.M 106 Fluhs, D 49 ă Gerard, J.P Geinitz, H 165, 177 Giannouli, S 59 Grosu, A.L 97 Herrmann, T 80 Hey S 116 Hoess, A 123 Quast, U 49 Rube, C 89 ă Roy, P Jeremic, B 130 Kneschaurek, P 177 Kolotas, C 59, 116 Kortmann, R.D 130 Kuzmany, A 177 Sandler, H.W 158 Schlegel, W 26 Schulz-Ertner, D 123 Stoll, P 165, 177 Strassmann, G 116 ´ Stuschke, M 71 Lahanas, M 59 Lahaniatis, J.E 152 Leizerowicz, A Trott, K.R Martin, T 116 Milas, L 17 Milickovic, N 59 Mohan, R 40 Molls, M 177 Narkwong, L 177 Nestle, U 80, 89 Pottgen, C 71 ă Petersen, C 80 Pirzkall, A 123 Vogt, H.-G 116 von Birgelen, C 49 Wannenmacher, M 123 Weber, W 97 Wiegel, T 145 Wu, Q 40 Wundrich, M 123 ¨ Zamboglou, N 59, 116 Zimmermann, F.B 165, 177 Zips, D 80 186 Subject Index Atrophy, chronic radiation injury 12–14 Brachytherapy, see also Intravascular brachytherapy glioma interstitial high dose rate brachytherapy computed tomography-guided implantation 116, 117, 120 dosing 117 patient selection 117 survival 117, 119, 121 low dose rate brachytherapy 116 imaging modalities 59 treatment planning autoactivation of source dwell positions 65, 67, 68 catheter reconstruction 59, 60 computed tomography-based catheter reconstruction accuracy 59, 61, 63 algorithms 61, 63 digitally reconstructed radiographs for catheter reconstruction 63–65 dose optimization 60 time analysis for components of planning procedure 60, 61 Brain metastases diagnostic imaging 130 prognosis 130 radiosurgery gamma knife, overview of outcomes 130, 131 linac-based radiosurgery, overview of outcomes 131, 132 prognostic factors dose 134, 135 histology 138, 139 location 140 necrosis 139 number of metastases 132, 133 performance status 136, 137 primary or recurrent lesions 139, 140 systemic disease activity 137, 142 time from diagnosis of primary tumor to metastasis diagnosis 141, 142 tumor volume and size 135, 136 whole-brain radiation combination therapy 140–142 rationale 131 whole-brain radiation therapy 130 Clinical phases, cancer Computed tomography, see also Treatment planning catheter reconstruction for brachytherapy accuracy 59, 61, 63 algorithms 61, 63 glioma guided implantation for interstitial high dose rate brachytherapy 116, 117, 120 treatment planning 97 non-small-cell lung cancer clinical target volume 91, 92, 94 Cost benefit, radiotherapy 187 Cure definition in cancer local control trends in cancer Denudation, radiation response 11 Dose-volume histogram, rectal bleeding estimation, see Prostate cancer Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors for use with radiotherapy 23 radiation-induced phosphorylation 19, 22 radiosensitivity of tumors effects of ligand 21, 22 effects of tumor expression 20, 21, 23 signal transduction overview 17–19 radiation effects 22, 23 tumor expression 19, 20 Erythema, radiation response 10, 11 Fibrosis, chronic radiation injury 14 Fixation systems fractionated treatments 27 single-dose irradiation 26, 27 Frame, see Fixation systems patient selection 107, 108 prognostic factor analysis 110 surgery and pathology 109, 110 survival 109 tolerance 109 treatment planning 108 Joint Center of Radiation Therapy Study 112, 113 lower-grade gliomas 113, 114 rationale 106, 107 University of Michigan Study 112, 113 University of Tokyo Study 112 prognosis 106, 110, 116 recurrence sites 106 treatment planning computed tomography 97 magnetic resonance imaging 97 positron emission tomography fluorodeoxyglucose tracer 98, 103 methionine tracer 99, 103 single-photon emission tomography using -methyl-tyrosine comparison with magnetic resonance imaging 99–103 metabolism of tracer 99 Hormonal ablation, see Prostate cancer Glioma brachytherapy interstitial high dose rate brachytherapy computed tomography-guided implantation 116, 117, 120 dosing 117 patient selection 117 survival 117, 119, 121 low dose rate brachytherapy 116 dose escalation studies grade and gliomas survival 111 treatment 111 grade 4/4 gliomas accelerated fractionation scheme 107, 108 follow-up 108, 109 imaging change analysis 110 necrosis outcomes 110, 111, 113 Subject Index Intensity-modulated radiotherapy advances 36, 37 beam boundary sharpening 40 brain tumor study convex ependymoma of posterior fossa 44–46 intensity distribution optimization 42 recurrent metastasis from lung at two foci 46–48 treatment planning 41, 42 homogeneity of dose distributions 40 multi-leaf collimators 36, 37, 41 Intravascular brachytherapy depth dose distribution 54, 55 positioning 53 radiation sources 51, 53 188 restenosis inhibition processes contributing to restenosis 49, 50 rationale 49 trials 49 treatment planning intravascular ultrasound 51, 54, 56 plastic-scintillator dosimetry 51–54, 56 structures at risk 51 target volume 51 Local tumor control conformal radiotherapy 5, definition metastasis following recurrence natural history of cancer non-small-cell cancer 89 organ-saving treatments radiation dose-dependence 3, relative survival rates timing of radiotherapy 4, Lung cancer clinical target volume computed tomography 91, 92, 94 definition 90, 94 elective nodal irradiation 90, 91 magnetic resonance imaging 92 mediastinoscopy for lymph node staging 92 positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose 93, 94 potential lymphatic drainage 91, 92 three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy 93, 94 conventional fractionated radiotherapy efficacy 71, 80, 81, 89 local failure rates and metastasis 89 lymph node involvement 90, 91 modified fractionation for non-small-cell cancer accelerated fractionation 81, 83, 84 accelerated hyperfractionation 82–84 conformal radiation techniques 85 Continuous Hyperfractionated Accelerated Radiotherapy-Bronchus Trial 83–85, 90 Subject Index hyperfractionation 81, 82 radiobiological basis 81, 82 planning target volume, factors influencing 93 radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy cisplatin regimens 72, 73 dosing 72 local control 72 metastasis prevention 72, 73 neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and resection dosing 75, 76 local control 76 pathologic complete remissions 74, 75 survival 76 pneumonitis risks 73, 74 survival 73 taxane regimens 73, 74 target volumes 71 Magnetic resonance imaging, see also Treatment planning glioma treatment planning 97 non-small-cell lung cancer clinical target volume 92 Meningioma features 123 fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy evaluation of response 125 histological diagnosis importance 127, 128 irradiation technique 124 late toxicity 126, 127 patient selection 124 rationale 123, 124 survival 126, 127 treatment planning 124 surgical resectional 123 Mortality, local tumor vs metastasis Multi-leaf collimator field sizes and types 34 intensity-modulated radiotherapy 36, 37, 41 linac-implemented collimators 35, 36 micro-collimators 36 189 Natural history, cancer Necrosis, chronic radiation injury 12, 14 Non-small-cell lung cancer, see Lung cancer Patient positioning, advances 28, 29 Positron emission tomography glioma treatment planning fluorodeoxyglucose tracer 98, 103 methionine tracer 99, 103 non-small-cell lung cancer clinical target volume determination with fluorodeoxyglucose 93, 94 Prostate cancer conformal radiotherapy in local control 5, controversies in management 152, 153 dose escalation with external-beam radiotherapy Fox Chase Cancer Center Study 160 historical data 158, 159 MD Anderson Hospital Study 159, 160 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Study 160 overview of benefits 161 prognostic factors 160, 161 prospects 161–163 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study 161 rectal bleeding 176 treatment planning 158 University of Michigan Study 163 dose-volume histograms in rectal bleeding estimation confounding factors comorbid conditions 180 contouring 179 organ movement and set-up deviations 180 organ structures and cranio-caudal borders 179 overview of studies 178 rationale 177, 184 study design dose-volume histograms 181, 182 outcomes 182, 183 Subject Index patients 180, 181 radiation technique 181 statistical analysis 182 epidemiology 152 hormonal ablation with adjuvant therapies conformal radiotherapy nonrandomized studies 170, 171 ongoing phase II–III studies 173 randomized trials 170, 172, 173 rationale 164, 165 mechanism of action 166, 167, 172 neoadjuvant concept 167, 168 prostatectomy follow-up 169 nonrandomized early studies 168 pathological downstaging 169 side effects 169 prostate-specific antigen screening goals of treatment 165 radical prostatectomy follow-up 145 radical prostatectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy persistent prostate-specific antigen management 148 phase III trials 147, 148 rationale 145, 146, 149 retrospective series 146, 147 side effects 149 three-dimensional vs two-dimensional radiotherapy dosing 154–157 patient characteristics in study 153, 154 prognostic factors 156 toxicity 155, 156 treatment planning 153, 154, 156 Radiation injury consequential late radiation damage 14, 15 growth factors and cytokines in pathogenesis 17 mechanisms in different organs acute injury 12, 13 190 chronic injury 12–14 stem cell inactivation in normal tissues 9, 10 Restenosis, see Intravascular brachytherapy Single-photon emission tomography, glioma treatment planning using -methyl-tyrosine comparison with magnetic resonance imaging 99–103 metabolism of tracer 99 Stem cell, inactivation in normal tissue damage 9, 10 Treatment planning, see also Computed tomography, Magnetic resonance imaging, Positron emission tomography, Single-photon emission tomography advances dose calculation 31, 32 inverse planning 33, 34, 37 planning programs 30, 31 target volume definition 30 visualization and evaluation of plans 32 brachytherapy, see Brachytherapy, Intravascular brachytherapy Target localization, advances 28 Tissue rescuing unit 10 Tolerance, irradiated tissue volume relationship Tracking systems, advances 30 Whole-brain radiation therapy, brain metastasis combination therapy with radiosurgery 140–142 outcomes 130 Subject Index 191 ... Three-Dimensional Radiation Treatment Frontiers of Radiation Therapy and Oncology Vol 34 Series Editors John L Meyer, San Francisco, Calif W Hinkelbein, Berlin Symposium on 3-D Radiation Treatment:... conformal and stereotactic techniques, dosimetry as well as in target volume concepts, and clinical studies have been performed This peer-reviewed volume of Frontiers of Radiation Therapy and Oncology. .. mechanisms of acute radiation injury in different organs Pathogenesis of Chronic Radiation Damage The pathogenesis of chronic radiation damage is even more complex than that of acute radiation damage and

Ngày đăng: 28/03/2014, 11:20