Thông tin tài liệu
VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, HANOI UNIVERSITY OF LANGUAGES AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES FACULTY OF POST GRADUATE STUDIES NGUYEN THI VIET NGA COMMUNICATION IN FAMILY DISPUTES (SURVEYING AMERICAN AND VIETNAMESE MOVIES) GIAO TIẾP TRONG TRANH CÃI GIA ĐÌNH (KHẢO SÁT PHIM MỸ VÀ PHIM VIỆT) HANOI 2015 LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add luanvanchat@agmail.com VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, HANOI UNIVERSITY OF LANGUAGES AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES FACULTY OF POST GRADUATE STUDIES NGUYEN THI VIET NGA COMMUNICATION IN FAMILY DISPUTES (SURVEYING AMERICAN AND VIETNAMESE MOVIES) GIAO TIẾP TRONG TRANH CÃI GIA ĐÌNH (KHẢO SÁT PHIM MỸ VÀ PHIM VIỆT) Field: English Linguistics Code: 62 22 15 01 A Thesis Submitted in Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Supervisors: Assoc Prof Dr Nguyen Van Do Assoc Prof Dr Vo Dai Quang HANOI 2015 LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add luanvanchat@agmail.com CERTIFICATE OF ORIGINALITY I certify my authority of the thesis submitted entitled COMMUNICATION IN FAMILY DISPUTES: SURVEYING AMERICAN AND VIETNAMESE MOVIES In fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Except where the reference is indicated, no other person’s work has been used without due acknowledgment in the text of the thesis Hanoi- 2015 Nguyen Thi Viet Nga LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add luanvanchat@agmail.com ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to express my deep gratitude to my two supervisors, Assoc Prof Dr Nguyen Van Do and Assoc Prof Dr Vo Dai Quang, for their valuable suggestions, guidance and encouragement throughout the course of this work, for their generous way of giving me time and constant willingness to help me with my thesis My gratefulness also goes to members of my committees at all levels of the research project (Prof Dr Nguyen Hoa, Prof.Dr Hoang Van Van, Prof Dr Nguyen Quang, Assoc.Prof.Dr Ngo Huu Hoang, Dr Huynh Anh Tuan) as they gave insightful comments and suggestions to my thesis I am also extremely thankful to Assoc Prof Dr Le Hung Tien, Former Dean of Faculty of Postgraduate Studies for his knowledgeable suggestions, support, understanding and kindness without which I would not have finished this thesis I am greatly indebted to my colleagues at ESP Division, Faculty of International Affairs, Academy of Journalism and Communication for their ceaseless support and patience, creating all favourable conditions for me to the research Last but not least, I owe my deepest gratitude to my parents, my husband and my two sons who helped me endure many difficult times during the process of this study Without their constant love and encouragement, completion of this study would not have been possible LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add luanvanchat@agmail.com ABSTRACT This thesis aims at yielding insights into the way American and Vietnamese people communicate during their family disputes, to find out similarities and differences between these two cultures in terms of disputing topics, escalation strategies and termination strategies Based on Hofstede’s (1990, 2001, 2010) theoretical framework of cultural dimensions, specifically Power distance, IndividualismCollectivism, Masculinity- Femininity, the study has identified impact of these dimensions on disputing stages between family members: initiation, escalation and termination “Dispute” in the thesis has been conceptualized as a dynamic interactional process which inaugurates with “arguable utterance- initial opposition” model, then progresses with mutual oppositions between disputants and ends with certain termination formats The thesis puts emphasis on analyzing two pairs of family relationships in American and Vietnamese movies: parent-child, and husband-wife They, in ages of 16-60, all live in urban areas Cross-cultural, cross-linguistic and discourse analysis approaches are combined to analyze data of movie dialogues Data analysis has been implemented on a revised and combined analytical framework suggested by Eisenberg & Garvey (1981), Maynard (1985), Hutchby (1996) and Vuchinich (1987,1990) From totally 4880 minutes of American movies and 5320 minutes of Vietnamese movies, the author categorized and selected 310 family disputes as samples Qualitative and quantitative methods are integrated to figure out a panorama of family disputes in two cultures The thesis has fulfilled the task of exploring the most common disputing topics and strategies that American and Vietnamese family members apply to achieve their goals in each disputing stage The language used for each strategy and cultural factors that affect strategies’ verbalization formats are also identified Hence, the similarities and differences between two languages and two cultures are disclosed Researching on family disputes provides a more comprehensive view of human LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add luanvanchat@agmail.com communication, which is not only formed by consensus but also confrontation This thesis’s results, therefore, are beneficial to understand cultures and also have particular merit for cross-cultural studies and foreign language learning LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add luanvanchat@agmail.com TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT i PART 1: INTRODUCTION 1 Rationale New contributions and significance of the study Aims and research questions of the study Scope of the study Methodology Organization of the study PART CHAPTER 1: LITERATURE REVIEW 1.1 Family defined 1.1.1 Family structurally defined 1.1.2 Family functionally defined 1.1.3 Family interactionally defined 1.2 Communication in family 11 1.2.1 Interpersonal communication 11 1.2.2 Strategies in communication 13 1.2.3 Communication and family relationships 15 1.3 Culture and family communication 17 1.3.1 Hofstede’s cultural dimensions 17 1.3.2 American culture 21 1.3.3 Vietnamese culture 23 1.4 Conceptualization of dispute 25 1.4.1 Related concepts to Dispute 26 1.4.1.1 Argument 26 1.4.1.2 Debate 27 1.4.1.3 Disagreement 28 LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add luanvanchat@agmail.com 1.4.1.4 Conflict 29 1.4.2 Dispute and family dispute 30 1.4.2.1 Concept of dispute 30 1.4.2.2 Dispute as one basic process in family communication 31 1.5 Reviewing related studies to disputes 33 1.5.1 Disputes among children 33 1.5.2 Disputes among adults 35 1.5.3 Disputes among family members 38 1.6 Summary 40 CHAPTER 2: METHODOLOGY 42 2.1 Research questions 42 2.2 Combined approach 42 2.3 Research methods 43 2.4 Data 45 2.4.1 Movie dialogues 45 2.4.2 Data selection criteria 48 2.4.3 Data collection procedure 49 2.4.4 Data description 49 2.5 Designing a framework for analysis 51 2.6 Coding system 54 2.7 Summary 58 CHAPTER 3: FAMILY DISPUTE INITIATION STAGE 59 3.1 Arguable utterances 59 3.2 Initial opposition 65 3.2.1 Recognizing initial opposition 65 3.2.2 Strategy of initial opposition 67 3.3 Concluding remarks 74 LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add luanvanchat@agmail.com CHAPTER 4: FAMILY DISPUTE ESCALATION STAGE 76 4.1 Escalating strategies 76 4.1.1 Reprimanding…………………………………………… 77 4.1.2 Disassociating 84 4.1.2.1 Ignoring others 85 4.1.2.2 Denying common interest 86 4.1.2.3 Using inappropriate addressing forms 88 4.1.3 Swearing 95 4.1.4 Threatening 100 4.1.5 Challenging 103 4.1.6 Demanding 105 4.1.7 Interrupting 109 4.1.8 Sulking 112 4.2 Combination of escalating strategies 116 4.3 Concluding remarks 122 CHAPTER 5: FAMILY DISPUTE TERMINATION STAGE 124 5.1 Termination strategies 125 5.1.1 Solvable disputes 125 5.1.1.1 Submitting 125 5.1.1.2 Compromising 129 5.1.2 Unsolvable disputes 131 5.1.2.1 Standing-off 131 5.1.2.2 Withdrawing 135 5.2 Concluding remarks 136 PART 3: CONCLUSION 141 Recapitulation ….141 LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add luanvanchat@agmail.com Major findings ….142 2.1 Similarities 142 2.2 Differences and cultural influences 144 Review on application of theoretical framework and analytical framework 146 Implications 148 Limitations of current study and suggestions for further research 150 REFERENCES APPENDICES APPENDIX iii APPENDIX iv APPENDIX v APPENDIX vi APPENDIX vii APPENDIX viii 10 LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add luanvanchat@agmail.com 12 Briggs, Charles L (ed.) 1996 Disorderly discourse: Narrative, conflict and inequalities Oxford: OUP 13 Brown, P., & Levinson, S (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 14 Burleson, B R., Delia, J G., & Applegate, J L (1995) The socialization of person-centered communication In M A Fitzpatrick & A L Vangelisti (Eds.), Explaining family interactions (pp 34–76) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 15 Burgess, E W, (1926) The family as a unity of interacting personalities The family 7, 3-9 16 Burton, J (1990) Conflict: Resolution and prevention New York: St Martin's Press 17 Buzzanell, P M., & Burrell, N A (1997) Examining metaphorical conflict schemas and expressions across contexts and sex Human Communication Research, 24, 109–146 18 Cameron, D , 2001 - Language Arts & Disciplines SAGE 19 Chaffee S H., McLeod J M., and Wackman D B (1973) “Family communication patterns and adolescent political participation,” J Dennis, Ed Socialization to Politics New York: Wiley & Sons, pp 349-364 20 Chao, J M C., Cheung, F Y L., & Wu, A M S (2011) Psychological contract breach and counterproductive workplace behaviors among Chinese employees International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 763777 21 Cheong, L.K,1983, Language and Language education, NUS Press 22 Corsaro, W A., & Rizzo, T A (1990) Disputes in the peer culture of American and Italian nursery-school children In A D Grimshaw (Ed.), Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations in conversations (pp 21-66) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 153 LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add luanvanchat@agmail.com 23 Corsaro, W A., & Maynard, D W (1996) Format tying in discussion and argumentation among Italian and American children In D I Slobin, J Gerhardt, A Kyratzis, & J Guo (Eds.), Social interaction, social context and language: Essays in honor of Susan Ervin- Tripp (pp 157-174) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 24 Culpeper, J (1996), Towards anatomy of impoliteness, Journal of pragmatics 25: 349-367 25 DeGenova, M K., & Rice, F P (2002) Intimate relationships, marriages and families (5th ed.) Boston: McGraw Hill 26 Dekovic, M & Buist, K.L (2005) Multiple perspectives within the family: Family relationship patterns Journal of Family Issues, 26, 467-490 27 DeFrancisco, Victoria Leto 1998 The Sounds of Silence: How men silence Women in Marital Relations In Jennifer Coates (ed.), Language and Gender: A Reader Oxford: Blackwell, 176-184 28 Deutsch M (1977), The resolution of conflict: constructive and destructive processes, Yale University Press, 1977 29 Devito J.A.,2012, 50 communication strategies, Bloomington 30 Diggs, R C., & Socha, T, (2004) Communication, families, and exploring the boundaries of diversity In A Vangelisti (Ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp 249-266) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 31 Eemeren, F.H., & Grootendorst R (2004) A Systematic Theory of Argumentation, The Pragma-Dialectical Approach (pp 123-196) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 32 Eisenberg & Garvey (1981) Children's use of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts Discourse Processes Cambridge: CUP 33 El- Samir S.F., 2011, Pragmatic Communicative Strategies, Al-Mustansiriya Journal of Arts 54, 1-22, University of Mustansriya 34 Ervin-Tripp , S 1982 Structures of control Communicating in the classroom, ed by L.C Wilkinson, 27-47 New York: Academic Press 154 LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add luanvanchat@agmail.com 35 Fitzpatrick, M A (1988) Between husbands and wives Newbury Park, CA: Sage 36 Freeley A & Steingberg, 2012, Argumentation and Debate- critical thinking for reasoned decision making, Cengage Learning 37 Georgakopoulou A (2001) Arguing about the future: on indirect disagreements in conversations Journal of pragmatics 33: 1881-1900 38 Goffman, Erving 1959 The presentation of self in everyday life New York 39 Goldstein B (2004), Bilingual Language Development and Disorders in Spanish-English Speakers, P.H Brookes Pub 40 Goodman, S H., Barfoot, B., Frye, A A., & Belli, A M (1999) Dimensions of marital conflict and children’s social problem-solving skills Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 33–45 41 Goodwin, R (1999) Personal relationships across cultures New York: Routledge 42 Goodwin, M.H., Goodwin, H & Yaeger-Dror, M (2002): Multi-modality in girls’ game disputes Journal of Pragmatics 34, 1621-49 43 Grimshaw, A.D (ed.) 1990 Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversations Cambridge: CUP 44 Grych, J H., & Fincham, F D (1990) Marital conflict and children’s adjustment: A cognitive-contextual framework Psychological Bulletin, 108, 267–290 45 Gudykunst, W B., & Ting-Toomey, S (1988) Culture and Interpersonal Communication Newbury Park, CA: Sage 46 Gudykunst, W B., & Lee, C M (2001) An agenda for studying ethnicity and family communication Journal of Family Communication, 1, 75-86 47 Hall, E T, (1976) Beyond culture Garden city, NC: Anchor 48 Heritage, J (1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement In J M.Atkinson & J Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social 155 LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add luanvanchat@agmail.com action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp 299-345) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 49 Hocker, J L., & Wilmot, W (1998) Interpersonal conflict Dubuque, IA: Wm C Brown & Co 50 Hofstede, G (1980) ) Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values Beverly Hills, CA: Sage 51 Hofstede, G (1991) Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind London: McGraw-Hill 52 Hofstede, Geert Jan 2001 Culture´s consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions and organizations across nations 2nd edition Thousand Oaks, Sage 53 Hofstede G & Hofstede G.J (2005), Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind 2nd Edition New York: McGraw-Hill USA 54 Hofstede, G., Hofstede G.J & Minkov ( 2010) Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind Revised and expanded 3rd Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill USA 55 Hofstede Centre , http://geert-hofstede.com/ 56 Holtgraves T.M (2014), The Oxford Handbook of Language and Social Psychology, Oxford University Press 57 Hornby A S Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (7th ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press 58 Hutchby, I (1996) Confrontation Talk: Arguments, asymmetries, and power on talk radio Matwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 59 Hy, Le Xuan; Howard, Robert; Nguyen, Thao; and Lilleleht, Erica (2005), Vietnamese cultural and religious femininity: Implications for conflict management and synergy Paper presented at the International Conference on Unity and Diversity in Religion and Culture, Seattle, 27-30 January 60 Hybels, S., & Weaver II R L (1992) Communicating Effectively (3rd Edition) New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc 156 LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add luanvanchat@agmail.com 61 Hymes, D H (1972) On Communicative Competence In Pride, J B., & Holmes, J (Eds.), Sociolinguistics, 269-293 Baltimore, USA: Penguin Education, Penguin Books Ltd 62 Hymes, D (1974) Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press 63 Infante, D A.,Myers, S A., & Buerkel, R A (1994) Argument and verbal aggression in constructive and destructive family and organizational disagreements Western Journal of Communication, 58, 73–84 64 Jacobs, S., & Jackson, S (1981) Argument as natural category: The routine grounds for arguing conversation The Western Journal of Speech Communication, 45, 118-132 65 Jandt F.E, 2010, An Introduction to Intercultural Communication: Identities in a Global Community, SAGE 66 Jaworski, Adam 2000 Silence and small talk, Small talk, ed by J.Coupland, 110-132 London: Longman 67 Johnson, C L (2000) Perspectives on American kinship in the later 1990s Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 623–639.\ 68 Kagitcibasi C & Berry J.W (1989) Cross-cultural psychology: current research and trends Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 493-531 69 Kakavá, C 1993 Negotiation of disagreement by Greeks in conversations and classroom discourse Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 70 Kakava, C 2002 Opposition in modern Greek discourse: Cultural and contextual constraints Journal of Pragmatics 34 1537-1568 71 Kieu, T.T.H (2006) Disagreeing in English and Vietnamese: a pragmatics and conversation analysis perspective, Doctoral Dissertation, College of Foreign Languages, VNU 157 LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add luanvanchat@agmail.com 72 Koerner, A F., & Fitzpatrick, M A (1997) Family type and conflict: The impact of conversation orientation and conformity orientation of conflict in the family Communication Studies, 48, 59-75 73 Kramsch, C 1998), Language and Culture, Oxford: OUP 74 Kuntsi K.M.H (2012), Politeness and impoliteness strategies used by lawyers in the “Dover trial” – a case study, English Language Pro Gradu – thesis, English Department, University of Eastern Finland 75 Kunitsyna, V.N., et al., 2002 Interpersonal Communication SPb 76 Labov W & Fanshel D 1977 Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation New York: Academic Press 77 Lachenicht L G(1980:668-671) “Aggravating language: A study of abusive and insulting language.” International Journal of Human communication 13 (4): 607–688 78 Lakoff, G 1972, “Hedges: A study of meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts”, Peranteau P., J Levi and G Phares (eds.) Chicago: Chicago University Press 183 – 228, 1972 79 Lakoff, R (1975) Language and women’s place New York, NY: Harper and Row 80 Lee C.F.L, 2004, Language output, communication strategies and communicative tasks: In the Chinese context, University Press of America 81 Leech, G, (1983) Principles of Pragmatics New York: Longman 82 Lein, L.& Brenneis D 1978 “Children’s disputes in three speech communities.” Language in Society 7: 299–323 83 Lerner, R M., & Spanier, G B (1978) Children's influences on marital and family interaction:A life-span perspective New York: Academic Press 84 Liu X, Zhang L., Zhang Y., 2010, Study on addressing terms and relevant culture in America and China, Journal of Language teaching and research, vol.1, No.5, 753-756 85 Locher, Miriam, 2004 Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in 158 LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add luanvanchat@agmail.com Oral Communication Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin 86 Longman (1994), Longman Dictionary of contemporary English, Longman Group Ltd England 87 Luong, Huy V (1990) Discursive Practices and Linguistic Meanings: The Vietnamese System of Person Reference Amsterdam and Philadenphia: John Benjamins 88 Lynch, E W (1998) Developing cross-cultural competence In E W Lynch & M J Hanson (Eds.), Developing cross-cultural competence: a guide for working with children and family (pp 47-89) Baltimore, MD: Brookes 89 Margolin, G., & Wampold, B (1981) Sequential analysis of conflict and accord in distressed and nondistressed marital partners Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 554–567 90 Markkanen, R & Schröder H., 1997, “Introduction” In Markkanen R and H Schröder (eds.) Hedging and Discourse: Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts Berlin: Walter de Gruyter – 18 91 Markus, H., & Kitayama, S (1991) Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation Psychological Review, 98, 224-253 92 Maynard, D W (1985) How children start arguments Language in Society, 14, 1-29 93 Miller, Brent; Boyd C Rollins; and Darwin L Thomas 1982 On methods of studying marriages and families Journal of Marriage and the Family 44 851-874 94 Mitchell, T (1975), The language of buying and selling in Cyrenaica In T.F Mitchell, Principles of Neo-Firthian Logic, London: Longman 95 Newell, S E Stutman R.K 1989 Negotiating confrontation: The problematic nature of initiation and response Research on Language and Social Interaction 23 139-162 159 LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add luanvanchat@agmail.com 96 Nguyen, Q.N (2009), Disagreeing among power-unequals in English and Vietnamese: a cross-cultural pragmatics study, Doctoral dissertation, College of Foreign Languages, VNU 97 Nikula, T., 1997, “Interlanguage View on Hedging” In Markkanen R and H Schröder (eds.) Hedging and Discourse: Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts Berlin: Walter de Gruyter 188 – 207 1997 98 Noller, P (1984) Nonverbal communication an marital interaction Oxford: Pergamon 99 Noller, P., & Fitzpatrick, M A (1993) Communication and family relationships Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall 100 Notarius, C I., & Johnson, J S (1982) Emotional expression in husbands and wives Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 483–489 101 Nurhayati, 2007, The use of swear words and its relationship with taboo words in Crank Thesis at English letters department, Letters and Humanities Faculty, Syarif Hidaatullah State Islamic University, Jakarta 102 O'Rourke J., Tuleja E., 2008, Intercultural Communication for Business, Cengage Learning 103 Oxford Learner’s Dictionary, 2002 104 Oyserman, D., Kemmelmeier, M., & Coon, H (2002) Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses Psychological Bulletin 128(1), 97-110 105 Paltridge B., (2012) Discourse Analysis: An Introduction , Bloomsbury Publishing 100.Patterson, Gerald R 1982 Coercive family process Eugene, Castalia 101 Peterson, G W, & Steinmetz, S K (1999) Perspectives on families as we approach the twenty-first century—Challenges for future handbook authors In M B Sussman, S K Steinmetz, & G W Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and family (p.1-12) New York: Plenum 160 LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add luanvanchat@agmail.com 102 Philipsen, & Huspek, M (1985) A bibliography of sociolinguistic studies of personal address Anthropological Linguistics, 27, 94-101 103 Pomerantz, A.1984 Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, ed by J.M Atkinson; and J Heritage, 152-163 New York: CUP 104 Popenoe, D (1993) American family decline, 1960-1990: A review and appraisal Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 527-542 105 Pyke, K (1999) The micropolitics of care in relationships between aging parents and adult children: Individualism, collectivism, and power Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 661-672 106 Quirk et al., 1985 A comprehensive grammar of the English language London: Longman 107 Radcliffe-Brown, A R (1965),Structure and function in primitive society New York: Free Press 108 Rees-Miller, J (2000) Power, severity and context in disagreements Journal of pragmatics, 32,1087-1111 109 Raffaelli M, 1992, "Sibling Conflict in Early Adolescence" Journal of Marriage and Family 54, pp 652-663 110 Richards J.C& Schmidt, 1983, Language and communication, Longman, London and New York 111 Riccillo S.C, (1994) The biological origins of intrapersonal communication, in Donna R Vocate , Intrapersonal Communication: Different Voices, Different Minds, Lawrence Arlbaum Associates, Inc Hillsdale, New Jersey 112 Sacks, H 1992 Lectures on conversation, vol 2, ed by G.Jefferson Oxford: Blackwell 113 Sacks H., Schegloff E & Jefferson G 1974 “A simplest systematic for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language 50: 697–735 114 Schegloff E & Sacks H 1973 Opening up closings Semiotica 289-327 161 LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add luanvanchat@agmail.com 115 Schiffrin, D 1984 Jewish argument as sociability Language in Society 13 311-335 116 Schiffrin, D 1985 Everyday argument: The organisation of diversity in talk Handbook of discourse analysis, vol 3, ed by T.A van Dijk, 35-46 London: Academic Press 117 Searle, J 1969 Speech acts Cambridge: CUP 118 Sergin C & Flora J., 2005, Family Communication, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers, Mahwah, NJ 119 Shimanoff S.B, 1980, Communication rules: Theory and research Beverly Hills, CA:Sage 120 Simmel, G 1908 (1950) The sociology of Georg Simmel, transand with an introduction, K.H Wolff Glencoe: Free Press 121 Sillars, A L., Canary, D J., & Tafoya, M (2004) Communication, conflict, and the quality of family relationships In A Vangelisti (Ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp 413-446) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 122 Spangler B.& Burgess H (2003), "Conflicts and Disputes." Beyond Intractability Conflict Information Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder 123 Spitz A 2005, Power plays: The representation of mother-daughter disputes in contemporary plays by women- A study in discourse analysis, PhD dissertation, University, Diss., Saarbrücken 124 Sprey, J 1971 On the management of conflict in families Journal of Marriage and the Family 33 722-731 125 Steckler G and Deskin G.(1999) Respect means not calling parents by their first names Daily News, Los Angeles 126 Strazny P, 2013, Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Routledge 127 Swan, M (1995), Practical English Usage, Oxford University Press 128 Tannen, D., 1984 Conversational Style Norwood, Ablex, NJ 162 LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add luanvanchat@agmail.com 129 Tannen, De 1990 “Silence as conflict management in fiction and drama: Pinter’s Betrayal and a short story ‘Great Wits’.” In Conflict Talk: sociolinguistic investigations of arguments and conversations, Allen D Grimshaw (ed.), 260–279 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 130 Tannen, D (2003a) Gender and family interaction In J.Holmes and M Meyer hoff (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (179-201 ) Malden, MA: Blackwel 131 Tannen, D (2003b) Power maneuvers or connection maneuvers? Ventriloquizing in family interaction In D.Tannen &J E Alatis (Eds.), Linguistics, language, and the real world: Discourse and beyond (50-62) Washington,DC: Georgetown University Press 132 Tannen D 2007, Family Talk : Discourse and Identity in Four American Families: Discourse and Identity in Four American Families, Oxford University Press 133 Tannen, D (2014), Gender and Family Interaction, in Handbook of Language, Gender, and Sexuality, (ed S Ehrlich, M Meyerhoff and J Holmes), John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, US) 134 Tedeschi, J.T (1970) Threats and promises The structure of conflict, ed by P Swingle, 155-187 New York: Academic Press 135 Tedeschi, J.T & Bonoma T.V (1977), Measures of last resort: Coercion and aggression in bargaining Negotiations: Social psychological perspectives, ed by D Druckman, 213-242 Beverly Hills: Sage 136 Temirgazina (2013), Effective Communicative Strategies and Tactics in Verbal Aggression Situations, World Applied Sciences Journal 24 (6): 822825 137 Ting-Toomey, S & Chung, L (2005) Understanding Intercultural Communication Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury 163 LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add luanvanchat@agmail.com 138 Triandis, H C (1986) Collectivism vs individualism: A reconceptualization of a basic concept in cross-cultural psychology In C Bagley & C Verma (Eds.), Personality, cognition, and values: Crosscultural perspectives of childhood and adolescence London: Macmillan 138.Triandis, H C (1994) Culture and social behavior New York: McGrawHill 139 Trenholm, S (1991) Human communication theory Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall 140 Trenholm S & Jensen A (2007), Interpersonal Communication, 6th edition, Oxford University Press 141 Tsui, Amy B.M (1994) English conversation Oxford: OUP 142 U.S Census Bureau (2002) American FactFinder: 2002 American Community Survey http://factfinder.census.gov 143 Vangelisti A.L., (2004) Handbook of family communication, Lawrence Erlbaum associates, New Jersey 144 Vijver, F.V, & Tanzer, N.K (1997) Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview European Review of Applied Psychology, 47, 319-329 145 Vuchinich, S (1984) Sequencing and social structure in family conflict Social Psychology Quarterly 47 146 Vuchinich, S (1986) On attenuation in verbal family conflict Social Psychology Quarterly 49 147 Vuchinich, S (1987) Starting and stopping spontaneous family conflicts Journal of Marriage and the Family 49 148 Vuchinich, S (1990) The sequential organization of closing in verbal family conflict Conflict talk, ed by A.D Grimshaw,Cambridge: CUP 149 Wamboldt, E, & Reiss, D (1989) Defining a family heritage and a new relationship identity: Two central tasks in the making of a marriage Family Process, 2, 317-335 164 LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add luanvanchat@agmail.com 150 Watts R.J , (1991), Power in Family Discourse, Walter de Gruyter, 151 Watzlawick, Paul; Janet H Beavin; and Don D Jackson 1967, Pragmatics of human communication New York: Norton 152 Weaver, G ( 2001), American Cultural values, Gary Weaver & Associates, Kokusai Bunka Kenshu 153 West R and Turner L.H (2009), Understanding Interpersonal Communication: Making Choices in Changing Times , Lyn Uhl, Wadsworth cengage learning, Boston, USA 154 West R and Turner L.H (2010) Introducing communication theory: analysis and application, fourth edition, McGraw-Hill Higher Education 155 Whitchurch, G C., & Dickson, F C (1999) Family communication In M B Sussman, S K Steinmetz, & G W Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family, 2nd, ed (pp 687-704) New York: Plenum 156 Wierzbicka A (1987) English Speech act verbs: a semantic dictionary, Academic Press, Canberra, Australia 157 Wierzbicka, A (2003), Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter 158 Wison, C (1979), Jokes: form, content, use and function New York; Academic Press 159 Yan.Y, 2012, A contrastive study on terminating patterns of marital conflict talk in China and America, Thesis, Foreign Languages School, Zhengzhou University, China 160 Zhao Y (2004) Conflict talk analysis, Foreign Language Research 5, 3742 161 Zhao N (2008) ‘Analysing the Meaning in Interaction in Politeness Strategies in Scent of a Woman’, The Journal of International Social Research, 1(4) 165 LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add luanvanchat@agmail.com 162 Zimmerman D H and West C 1975 Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation In Barrie, T & Nancy H Eds Language and Sex: difference and dominance Rowley, MA: Newbury House 163 Zyubina, I., 2011, The study of politicians’ speech behavior, IVth Inernational Conference on Pragmalinguistics and speech practices, Cambridge Scholars Publishing VIETNAMESE Mai Huy Bích (2011) Xã hội học Gia đình NXB Khoa học xã hội, Hà Nội Hữu Đạt (2000), Văn hóa Ngơn ngư̄ giao tiếp người Việt, Nhà xuất Văn hóa thông tin, Hà Nội Phạm Minh Hạc (1996), Nghiên cứu xã hội học, Nhà xuất Chính trị quốc gia Nguyễn Minh Hịa,2000, Hơn nhân - Gia đình xã hội đại, Nxb Trẻ, Hà Nội Vũ Ngọc Khánh, 2004, Văn hóa Việt Nam: điều học hỏi : bình diện văn hóa Việt Nam, Nhà xuất Văn hóa-thơng tin, Hà Nội Vũ Ngọc Khánh, 2007, Văn hóa gia đình Việt Nam, NXB Thanh niên, Hà nội Vũ Khiêu (chủ biên), 1995, Nho giáo gia đình, Nxb khoa học xã hội, Hà Nội Lê Minh (chủ biên), 1994, Văn hóa gia đình Việt Nam phát triển xã hội, Nxb Lao động, Hà Nội Phan Ngọc,1998, Bản sắc văn hóa Việt Nam, NXB Văn hóa thơng tin, Hà Nội 10 Hoàng Phê, 2002, Từ điển tiếng Việt, Trung tâm từ điển học, Hà Nội 11 Phạm Côn Sơn, 2005, Gia lễ xưa nay, Nxb Thanh niên, Hà Nội 12 Trần Ngọc Thêm (chủ biên),2003, Văn hóa học văn hóa Việt Nam, Nxb Đại học Sư phạm, Hà Nội 166 LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add luanvanchat@agmail.com 13 Ngơ Đức Thịnh, 2003, Tìm hiểu luật tục tộc người Việt Nam, Nhà xuất Khoa học xã hội, Hà Nội 14 Nguyễn Thị Thọ,2007, “Từ đạo hiếu truyền thống, nghĩ đạo hiếu ngày nay”, Tạp chí Triết học, (6), tr.13 - 16 15 Lê Ngọc Văn ,1998, Gia đình Việt Nam với chức xã hội hóa, Nxb Giáo dục, Hà Nội 16 Lê Ngọc Văn (2011) Gia đình biến đổi gia đình Việt Nam Hà Nội: NXB Khoa học xã hội 17 Trần Quốc Vượng, 2001, Văn hóa Việt Nam tìm tòi suy ngẫm, NXB Văn học, Hà Nội 167 LUAN VAN CHAT LUONG download : add luanvanchat@agmail.com ... TRONG TRANH CÃI GIA ĐÌNH (KHẢO SÁT PHIM MỸ VÀ PHIM VIỆT) Field: English Linguistics Code: 62 22 15 01 A Thesis Submitted in Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy... OF LANGUAGES AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES FACULTY OF POST GRADUATE STUDIES NGUYEN THI VIET NGA COMMUNICATION IN FAMILY DISPUTES (SURVEYING AMERICAN AND VIETNAMESE MOVIES) GIAO TIẾP TRONG TRANH CÃI... Table 10: Categories of weak swear words in American family disputes 96 LISTS OF CHARTS Chart 1: Scores of cultural dimensions for the USA (Hofstede 2010 ) 22 Chart 2: Scores of cultural dimensions
Ngày đăng: 06/12/2022, 08:44
Xem thêm:
