peer review report 1 on future changes in precipitation and water resources for kanto region in japan after application of pseudo global warming method and dynamical downscaling

Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies (2017) 193–194 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ejrh Peer Review Report Peer review report on “Future changes in precipitation and water resources for Kanto Region in Japan after application of pseudo global warming method and dynamical downscaling” Original Submission 1.1 Recommendation Major Revision Comments to Author: Review of “Application of Pseudo Global Warming Method and Dynamic Downscaling for Kanto Region in Japan and ă K Taniguchi, submitted to Journal of Variations in Precipitation and Effects on Water Resources in Future Climate,by Hydrology This paper is the revision of the manuscript number EJRH-D-15-00226 The author partly addressed the reviewers’ concerns, but some concerns have not been addressed yet The methodology is well written in the revision However, it seems that this methodology has a crucial problem (see Major comment 1) In addition, the paper is overall lack of basic perspectives of climatology I recommend that the author collaborates with experts of regional climate modeling and co-writes this paper Therefore, I conclude that a farther significant revision is needed to be suitable for Journal of Hydrology I only point out the crucial issues in this review stage First revision 3.1 Recommendation Major Revision Comments to the author See attached file Second revision 5.1 Recommendation Major Revision DOI of the original article:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2016.10.004 2214-5818/$ – see front matter http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2016.12.066 194 Peer Review Report / Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies (2017) 193–194 Comments to the author This paper is the third revision of the manuscript number EJRH-D-15-00226 The author addressed most of reviewer’s concerns This paper is largely improved There are only one major concern and a few minor comments See attached file After addressing this major concern, I think the paper is acceptable for Journal of Hydrology Anonymous .. .19 4 Peer Review Report / Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies (2 017 ) 19 3? ?19 4 Comments to the author This paper is the third revision of the manuscript number EJRH-D -15 -00226 The... addressed most of reviewer’s concerns This paper is largely improved There are only one major concern and a few minor comments See attached file After addressing this major concern, I think the paper... attached file After addressing this major concern, I think the paper is acceptable for Journal of Hydrology Anonymous