Idaho-State-University-IEAC-Project-Ranking-Rubric

Idaho State University IEAC Project Ranking Rubric Project Name: Project Sponsor/Organization: Project Description: Score Minimum=210 Row Maximum=1540 Number Higher is Better Driver Category Weight Low Point Is the Project part of a directive from the IEAC Steering Committee? Is this project necessary to comply with University policy, the State Board of Education policy, a State or Federal Mandate or an accrediting organization? 25 Does this project have an existing funding source? 25 Is this project necessary to ensure the physical safety of University members or the data of University systems? Does this project support the University strategic plan, or has it been identified as an outcome of Program Prioritization? 25 25 20 Proposed Date of Implementation: Moderate Points Strong Points Extreme Points Project is not a directive from the IEAC Steering Committee NA NA Project is a directive from the IEAC Steering Committee No noticeable impact on compliance with University policy, SBOE policy, or Federal or State Mandate None of the required funding source has been secured Project establishes compliance with an upcoming University policy, SBOE policy, or Federal or State Mandate or accrediting organization Less than 50% of funding source has been secured Project establishes compliance with a current University policy, SBOE policy, or Federal or State Mandate or accrediting organization 50% or more of the funding source has been secured No noticeable security risks to University members, University data, or University systems Project does not advance the department in support of the overall University strategic plan Project has not been identified as an outcome of Program Prioritization Project establishes compliance with a University policy, SBOE policy, or Federal or State Mandate that must be implemented in a period of less than 90 days 100% of the funding source has been secured Potential security risks exist for University Project mitigates a major security risk for members, University data, or University University members, University data, or systems University systems Project mitigates an active security risk for University members, University data, or University systems Project directly advances a departmental goal in support of the University strategic Project directly advances a division goal in support of the University strategic plan or as a plan or as a priority of Program Prioritization priority of Program Prioritization Project directly supports the University strategic plan or has been identified as a priority for Program Prioritization 15 Project does not change the technical operations of a department or the University Project does not increase the University's research initiatives Project mitigates a potential operational risk to a department or the University Project indirectly increases the University's research initiatives Project mitigates a known operational risk to a department or the University NA Project directly increases the University's NA research initiatives Project indirectly increases the University's ability to attract, retain, and/or graduate students Project directly increases the University's ability NA to attract, retain, and/or graduate students Is this project required to sustain the technical operations of a department or the University? Will this project increase the University's research initiatives? Will this project increase the University's ability to attract, retain and/or graduate students? 15 Project does not increase the University's ability to attract, retain and/or graduate students Will this project improve the effectiveness of students? 10 Project offers no noticeable benefit or has limited impact on students Project mitigates potential issues or establishes a new process for students Project mitigates a major issue for all or large portion of students 10 Will this project increase faculty's effeciency and effectiveness? 10 Project offers no noticeable benefit or has limited impact on faculty Project mitigates potential issues or establishes a new process for all faculty Project mitigates a major issue for all or a large Project offers significant improvement to the portion of faculty faculty 11 Will this project increase staff's effeciency and effectiveness? 10 Project offers no noticeable benefit or has limited impact on staff Project mitigates potential issues or establishes a new process for all staff Project mitigates a major issue for all or a large portion of staff Project offers significant improvements to staff 10 Current system is functioning, but could Current system is functioning, but is be enhanced nearing end of life 10 There is no time requirement 12 13 Overall Score: What is the state of the current system that this project will replace? Is there risk to the University if this project is not completed by a certain time? IEAC Subcommittee Recommendation: 20 The time requirement is self-imposed Project replaces a system with impaired functionality, or is a significant maintenance burden The time requirement is imposed by an outside organization but is negotiable Project offers significant improvement to students Current system either does not exist, is completely inadequate, is at the end of its life, or is a critical application that has failed The time requirement is not negotiable Project Rating Description