1. Trang chủ
  2. » Ngoại Ngữ

University-of-Oklahoma-NSLVE-2018

13 1 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

SEPTEMBER 2019 2014 & 2018 CAMPUS REPORT WHAT'S INSIDE About This Report Student Voting Rates for University of OklahomaNorman Campus Your Institution's Voting Data Voting and Registration Rates How Your Institution's Numbers Compare Your Students' Voting Data By Voting Method By Age Group By Education Level By Undergraduate Class Year By Enrollment Status By Gender By Race/Ethnicity By Field of Study NSLVE CAMPUS REPORT | University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus About This Report Thank you for participating in the National Study of Learning, Voting, and Engagement (NSLVE) Since Thank you for participating the 1,000 National Study of NSLVE’s launch in 2013, moreinthan colleges and Learning, Voting, and Engagement (NSLVE) Since universities have signed up to receive their voting rates NSLVE’s launch 2013, 1,000 colleges for the 2012, 2014,in2016 andmore 2018than federal elections and universities signed up participation to receive their Along with others,have your institution’s in this study has helped us build a robust database research voting rates for the 2012, 2014 and 2016for elections on more than 10 million student records in for Along with others, yourde-identified institution’s participation eachstudy election year this has allowed us to build a robust database of nearly 30 million college student records, about NSLVE is a signature initiative of the Institute for 10 million for each election year, that serve as a Democracy and Higher Education (IDHE) at Tufts foundation for innovative research University's Jonathan M Tisch Collegeon of college Civic Life student political engagement IDHE is an appliedlearning researchand center focused onin college democracy and university student political learning and participation in democracy IDHE researchers study voting, campus NSLVE is for a signature initiative the Institute for conditions political learning andofdiscussion, closing equity gaps inand participation, and increasing student Democracy Higher Education (IDHE) at the agencyCollege and participation We accomplish our goals Tisch of Civic Life, Tufts University The through research, resource development, mission of IDHE is to shift college and assisting university institutionsand andculture the higher educationpolitical community, and priorities to advance learning, advocacy agency, and equity We achieve our mission through research, resource development, technical About the Data assistance, and advocacy The voter registration and voting rates in this report About thepercentage Data reflect the of your institution's students who werevoter eligible to vote andand whovoting voted in the 2014 and 2018 The registration rates in this report elections results are based on enrollment records reflect theThese percentage of your institution's students your institution submitted to and the National Student who were eligible to vote who actually voted in Clearinghouse and publicly available voting files are collected the 2012 and 2016 elections These results by Catalist We exclude FERPA-blocked records (For based on enrollment records your institution exceptions for campuses with disproportionately high submitted the National numbers ofto FERPA blocked Student students,Clearinghouse see our Campus (FERPA-blocked records excluded) and publicly Reports FAQ.) available voting files collected by Catalist The institutional voting rates reported on page are We use an estimatedannumber of non-resident aliens adjusted by deducting estimated number of students identified each institution as non-resident aliens and based onby IPEDS data to account for non-resident reported the Integrated Education aliens into calculations of Postsecondary overall voting rates, but Data are System (IPEDS) For breakdowns by student unable to so for voting rates by student characteristics in We subsequent pagesadjust of the for report, we characteristics also cannot resident cannot consistently adjust for students who are ineligible aliens or undocumented students This may result in to vote: non-resident aliens (international students), your institution’s actual voting rate being higher than resident aliens (undocumented students), and students we To calculate that percentage, and to read whoreport have been disenfranchised due to a felony more about see our FAQ on voting Campus conviction AsNSLVE a result,data, your institution’s actual rate Reports may be higher than we report If you have access to What to next? What to the data next? q and identify your challenges and Review opportunities This report provides comparisons This report provides a q Review the data between subgroups of your students and with baseline measure of your students’ similar institutions For more comparisons or to see engagement in democracy 2012read andour 2016 as national voter registration and votinginrates, well as compares your institution’s voting national report, Democracy Counts 2018 To accessrates to similar Visit our website for more our data portals institutions comparison data https://idhe.tufts.edu/public-data-portal-visualizat ions q Share the report widely and strategically, q Share the report widely strategically by including posting it and online The Communications sharing it with institutional faculty across package has more leaders, tips disciplines, student government leaders, and other student groups q Put your data into practice Use our IDHE Knowledgebase to guide you ten q Read and implement (link) Election Imperatives, recommendations for improving your campus campus climate for student q for Address climate studentyour political learning, discourse, political learning -Start by using the IDHE selfequity, and participation https://idhe.tufts.edu/electionimperatives assessment rubric, or bring the IDHE team to your campus q Work with us IDHE can help via virtual office hours,qwebinars, brown bag discussions, coaching, IDHE We are available with Partner with and in-person workshops virtual office hours, webinars, brown bag discussions and in-person trainings For up-to-date news on NSLVE data, resources and upcoming opportunities visitNSLVE our website: For up-to-date news on data, resources and https://idhe.tufts.edu upcoming opportunities visit our website: idhe.tufts.edu and follow us on Twitter: @TuftsIDHE Follow us on Twitter @TuftsIDHE Email us your feedback and questions at NSLVE@tufts.edu We appreciate hearing from you! Please email us at NSLVE@tufts.edu Warm regards, Warm regards, IDHE Team IDHE Team more complete data for students who are ineligible to vote, youalso maysee recalculate your rates by using the Please our NSLVE Method (insert link) for Recalculation Toolstudy a more detailed methodology https://idhe.tufts.edu/nslve-recalculation-tool Reviewing the Data To read more about NSLVE data, see our Campus Use the FAQ following key to interpret the charts: Reports *https://idhe.tufts.edu/nslve/frequently-asked-questio = number of students is less than 10 n/a ns = no data was collected or calculated for this field Reviewing the Data Use the following key to interpret the charts: * = number of students is less than 10 n/a = no data was collected or calculated for this field IDHE.TUFTS.EDU | 13 NSLVE CAMPUS REPORT | University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus YOUR STUDENTS' VOTING DATA | MIDTERM ELECTIONS Voting and Registration Rates 2018 Voting Rate 33.3% Registration Rate CHANGE FROM 2014 +17.5 Voting Rate of Registered Students 2018 VOTING RATE FOR ALL INSTITUTIONS 39.1% Voting Rate 100 90 72.9% 80 64.7% 70 60 45.7% 50 33.3% 40 24.4% 30 15.8% 20 10 2014 2018 2014 2018 2014 2018 All Institutions, 2018 2014 2018 Change 31,854 31,345 -509 (140) (2,152) (199) (201) (2,017) (437) Total eligible voters 29,363 28,690 -673 Number of students who registered 19,000 20,899 1,899 4,636 9,558 4,922 Registration rate 64.7% 72.9% 8.1 Voting rate of registered students 24.4% 45.7% 21.3 Voting rate 15.8% 33.3% 17.5 -3.9 -5.8 Total student enrollment Age under 18/Unknown IPEDS estimated non-resident aliens FERPA records blocked Number of students who voted Difference from all institutions IDHE.TUFTS.EDU | 13 NSLVE CAMPUS REPORT | University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus HOW YOUR NUMBERS COMPARE | MIDTERM ELECTIONS By Carnegie Classification HIGH 2014 Voting Rate for All Institutions 19.7% Your Institution 64.1% 39.1% LOW 1.5% Difference from All Institutions HIGH 2018 Voting Rate for All Institutions 54.0% -3.9 LOW 11.5% Difference from All Institutions Research Institutions Public Research Institutions -5.8 Private Research Institutions 100 90 80 70 60 50 41.2% 40 33.3% 30 20 42.5% 40.8% 19.5% 15.8% 19.6% 17.6% 10 2014 IDHE.TUFTS.EDU 2018 2014 2018 2014 2018 2014 NSLVE CAMPUS REPORT | University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus 2018 | 13 NSLVE CAMPUS REPORT | University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus YOUR STUDENTS' VOTING DATA | MIDTERM ELECTIONS By Voting Method* Absentee Early Vote In-Person, Election Day Mail 100 90 79.6% 80 70 62.5% 60 50 40 24.5% 30 20 12.7% 10 6.9% 3.2% 2.1% 3.7% 2014 2018 2014 2018 2014 2018 2014 Voted 2014 2018 2018 Rate Voted Rate Change Absentee 588 12.7% 2,343 24.5% 11.8 Early Vote 148 3.2% 657 6.9% 3.7 97 2.1% 354 3.7% 1.6 3,689 79.6% 5,974 62.5% -17.1 114 2.5% 230 2.4% Mail In-Person, Election Day Unknown Total 4,636 9,558 * Your students' data broken down by voting method If your campus has a high number of voting method "Unknown", it means that this information was not reported by local officals where your students voted IDHE.TUFTS.EDU | 13 NSLVE CAMPUS REPORT | University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus YOUR STUDENTS' VOTING DATA | MIDTERM ELECTIONS By Age Group* 18-21 22-24 25-29 30-39 40-49 50+ 100 90 80 70 60.7% 60 52.0% 50.5% 50 40 31.3% 26.5% 30 39.5% 39.2% 2018 2014 27.9% 18.3% 20 10 32.3% 12.5% 8.0% 2014 2018 2014 2014 2018 2018 2014 2014 Enrolled Voted 18-21 14,786 1,179 22-24 6,770 25-29 2018 2014 2018 2018 Enrolled Voted Rate 8.0% 15,603 4,135 26.5% 18.5 843 12.5% 6,415 2,009 31.3% 18.9 4,593 841 18.3% 3,914 1,265 32.3% 14.0 30-39 3,495 975 27.9% 3,026 1,194 39.5% 11.6 40-49 1,305 512 39.2% 1,222 635 52.0% 12.7 566 286 50.5% 527 320 60.7% 10.2 50+ Unknown Rate Change * Your students' data broken down by age at the time of the election To provide more accurate voting rates, students ineligible to vote because they were too young, students whose age data was not reported to the Clearinghouse, as well as records that were FERPA blocked are removed from this table Please note that we are not able to adjust these voting rates by removing non-resident aliens, resident aliens or undocumented students IDHE.TUFTS.EDU | 13 NSLVE CAMPUS REPORT | University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus YOUR STUDENTS' VOTING DATA | MIDTERM ELECTIONS By Education Level* Undergraduate Graduate 100 90 80 70 60 50 39.6% 40 28.0% 30 20 10 n/a n/a 2014 2014 2018 2014 Enrolled Voted Undergraduate 0 Graduate 0 Unknown 31,515 2018 2018 Rate Enrolled Voted Rate Change n/a 21,687 6,073 28.0% n/a n/a 8,647 3,426 39.6% n/a 373 * Your students' data broken down by undergraduate and graduate students To provide more accurate voting rates, students ineligible to vote because they were too young, students whose age data was not reported to the Clearinghouse, as well as records that were FERPA blocked are removed from this table Please note that we are not able to adjust these voting rates by removing non-resident aliens, resident aliens or undocumented students IDHE.TUFTS.EDU | 13 NSLVE CAMPUS REPORT | University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus YOUR STUDENTS' VOTING DATA | MIDTERM ELECTIONS By Undergraduate Class Year* First Year Sophomore Upper-level 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 31.2% 25.6% 21.9% 20 10 13.1% 7.8% 6.4% 2014 2018 2014 2018 2014 2014 Enrolled Voted First Year 4,710 303 Sophomore 4,385 Upper-level 12,686 2018 2018 Rate Enrolled Voted Rate Change 6.4% 4,701 1,027 21.9% 15.4 342 7.8% 4,499 1,152 25.6% 17.8 1,666 13.1% 12,501 3,896 31.2% 18.0 * Your students' data broken down by undergraduate students' class level To provide more accurate voting rates, students ineligible to vote because they were too young, students whose age data was not reported to the Clearinghouse, as well as records that were FERPA blocked are removed from this table Please note that we are not able to adjust these voting rates by removing non-resident aliens, resident aliens or undocumented students IDHE.TUFTS.EDU | 13 NSLVE CAMPUS REPORT | University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus YOUR STUDENTS' VOTING DATA | MIDTERM ELECTIONS By Enrollment Status* Full-time Part-time 100 90 80 70 60 50 37.3% 40 29.5% 30 20 22.2% 11.6% 10 2014 2014 2018 2014 2018 2018 Enrolled Voted Rate Enrolled Voted Rate Full-time 22,242 2,575 Part-time 9,273 Unknown Change 11.6% 24,366 7,190 29.5% 17.9 2,061 22.2% 6,341 2,368 37.3% 15.1 n/a 0 n/a * Your students' data broken down by part-time and full-time students To provide more accurate voting rates, students ineligible to vote because they were too young, students whose age data was not reported to the Clearinghouse, as well as records that were FERPA blocked are removed from this table Please note that we are not able to adjust these voting rates by removing non-resident aliens, resident aliens or undocumented students IDHE.TUFTS.EDU | 13 NSLVE CAMPUS REPORT | University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus YOUR STUDENTS' VOTING DATA | MIDTERM ELECTIONS By Gender* Women Men 100 90 80 70 60 50 34.0% 40 28.0% 30 20 16.0% 13.4% 10 2014 2018 2014 2014 2018 Enrolled Voted Rate Women 16,089 2,577 Men 15,420 2,058 Unknown * 2018 Enrolled Voted Rate Change 16.0% 16,017 5,445 34.0% 18.0 13.4% 14,669 4,104 28.0% 14.6 21 * Your students' data broken down by gender To provide more accurate voting rates, students ineligible to vote because they were too young, students whose age data was not reported to the Clearinghouse, as well as records that were FERPA blocked are removed from this table Please note that we are not able to adjust these voting rates by removing non-resident aliens, resident aliens or undocumented students IDHE.TUFTS.EDU 10 | 13 NSLVE CAMPUS REPORT | University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus NSLVE CAMPUS REPORT | University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus YOUR STUDENTS' VOTING DATA | MIDTERM ELECTIONS By Race/Ethnicity* Asian American Indian / Alaska Native Black Hispanic Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander White or More Races 100 90 80 70 60 50 40.0% 38.0% 40 30 10 20.0% 16.4% 15.6% 20 19.5% 19.7% 7.2% n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2014 2018 2014 2018 2014 2018 2014 2018 2014 2018 2014 Enrolled Voted Asian 334 24 American Indian/ Alaska Native 122 Black Hispanic Native Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander White or More Races Unknown 2014 2018 2014 2018 2018 Enrolled Voted 7.2% 83 n/a n/a 19 15.6% 0 n/a n/a 116 19 16.4% 142 54 38.0% 21.7 155 31 20.0% 62 * n/a n/a 0 n/a 0 n/a n/a 2,291 446 19.5% 2,577 1,030 40.0% 20.5 229 45 19.7% 0 n/a n/a 28,268 Rate Rate Change 27,843 * Your students' data broken down by race To provide more accurate voting rates, students ineligible to vote because they were too young, students whose age data was not reported to the Clearinghouse, as well as records that were FERPA blocked are removed from this table Please note that we are not able to adjust these voting rates by removing non-resident aliens, resident aliens or undocumented students For this page, we consider international students of unknown race/ethnicity IDHE.TUFTS.EDU 11 | 13 NSLVE CAMPUS REPORT | University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus NSLVE CAMPUS REPORT | University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus YOUR STUDENTS' VOTING DATA | MIDTERM ELECTIONS By Field of Study* * Your students' data broken down by field of study To provide more accurate voting rates, students ineligible to vote because they were too young, students whose age data was not reported to the Clearinghouse, as well as records that were FERPA blocked are removed from this table Please note that we are not able to adjust these voting rates by removing non-resident aliens, resident aliens or undocumented students The green and red highlighted values below represent your campus's top three and bottom three voting rates by field of study 2014 Architecture Enrolled Voted 243 35 2018 Rate Enrolled Voted Rate 14.4% 316 89 28.2% 13.8 Change Area, Ethnic, Cultural, Gender, and Group Studies Biological and Biomedical Sciences Business, Management, and Marketing 85 22 25.9% 75 35 46.7% 20.8 1,861 171 9.2% 1,247 368 29.5% 20.3 5,162 614 11.9% 4,934 1,284 26.0% 14.1 Communication and Journalism 1,638 176 10.7% 1,700 514 30.2% 19.5 421 53 12.6% 751 203 27.0% 14.4 Education 1,488 417 28.0% 1,329 550 41.4% 13.4 Engineering and Engineering Technologies 3,965 292 7.4% 3,510 827 23.6% 16.2 English Language and Literature 261 54 20.7% 160 65 40.6% 19.9 Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics 254 44 17.3% 249 91 36.6% 19.2 4,206 625 14.9% 5,369 1,668 31.1% 16.2 History 234 58 24.8% 203 92 45.3% 20.5 Law Enforcement, Firefighting, and Protective Services 336 83 24.7% 179 64 35.8% 11.1 Legal Professions and Studies 591 158 26.7% 1,499 644 43.0% 16.2 Liberal Arts and Sciences, and Humanities 2,705 640 23.7% 1,544 637 41.3% 17.6 Library Science 136 66 48.5% 187 116 62.0% 13.5 Mathematics and Statistics 180 23 12.8% 235 68 28.9% 16.2 1,606 230 14.3% 1,141 316 27.7% 13.4 130 28 21.5% 171 66 38.6% 17.1 805 44 5.5% 659 142 21.6% 16.1 95 15 15.8% 82 30 36.6% 20.8 1,203 126 10.5% 966 244 25.3% 14.8 799 87 10.9% 815 240 29.5% 18.6 Computer and Information Sciences Health Professions Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies Natural Resources and Conservation Parks, Recreation, Leisure, and Fitness Studies Philosophy and Religious Studies Physical Sciences Psychology IDHE.TUFTS.EDU 12 | 13 Public Administration and Social Service Professions Social Sciences 629 195 31.0% 747 405 54.2% 23.2 1,220 247 20.3% 1,088 365 33.6% 13.3 149 11 7.4% 241 66 27.4% 20.0 1,020 106 10.4% 929 305 32.8% 22.4 93 16 17.2% 381 64 16.8% -0.4 Transportation and Materials Moving Visual and Performing Arts Unknown Thank you for the work you to improve your students’ political learning and engagement We hope that you find your NSLVE report useful For up-to-date news on NSLVE data, resources, and to sign up for our newsletter visit: https://idhe.tufts.edu References: IDHE encourages report recipients to share this report as broadly as possible, including posting it on the college or university’s website When doing so, please use the following citation: Institute for Democracy & Higher Education: National Study of Learning, Voting and Engagement (2019) 2014 and 2018 report for [name of institution] Medford, MA Follow us: @TuftsIDHE Contact us: Institute for Democracy & Higher Education: National Study of Learning, Voting and Engagement Lincoln Filene Hall, Medford, MA 02155 NSLVE@tufts.edu | 617-627-0620 IDHE.TUFTS.EDU 13 | 13

Ngày đăng: 26/10/2022, 10:03

Xem thêm: