2017 LOUISIANA TEACHER PREPARATION DATA DASHBOARD Southern University at New Orleans Prepared by Louisiana Board of Regents & Southern University System Public University Alternate Teacher Preparation Program BASIC PROGRAM INFORMATION http://www.suno.edu/education Program Web Site Approval/Accreditation Names of Agencies Type of Program CANDIDATE SELECTION PROFILE Completer Passage Rate on Praxis Skills Assessment (2014-15) Median GPA of Candidates Entering the Program (2014-15) Median GPA of Candidates Completing the Program (2014-15) Number of Candidates who Started but Did not Complete the Program Within Years (by 2014-15) Data not yet available Enrolled Completers Candidates 28 16 (2014-15) Males Females Enrolled 14 14 Gender Hispanic Indian Asian Black Islander White Enrolled 0 19 Race Academic Strength Teaching Promise Candidates/ Completer Diversity Knowledge Status State: Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE) State: Board of Regents (BoR) Regional: Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges (SACSCOC) National: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE); Teacher Education Accreditation Council (TEAC); or Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) Alternate (Certification-Only) Content Pedagogical Overall Clinical Experiences KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS FOR TEACHING OF COMPLETERS Completer Passage Rate on Praxis Content Assessments (2014-15) Completer Passage Rate on Praxis Professional Knowledge Assessments (2014-15) Completer Passage Rate on all Assessments (2014-15) Full Time Internships are Offered as an option for the Academic Year Student Clock Hours of Clinical Experiences Prior to Student Teaching Number of Number of Teaching Clock Hours of Clinical Experiences Weeks Clock Hours per During Student Teaching Approved Approved Accredited Accredited 100% 2.94 3.36 Data Not Yet Available Total 44 Multi-Racial 100% 100% 100% Yes 180 Total Number of Clock Hours Week Licensure Requirements Completer Rating Entry and Persistence in Teaching in Public Schools in Louisiana (Please examine the 2017 Louisiana Teacher Preparation Data Fact Book to accurately interpret the meaning of these scores.) Placement/Persistence in High-Need Subjects/Schools 10 Number and Percentage of 2014-15 Completers That Meet State Licensing Requirements Data Not Yet Available 40 PROGRAM PRODUCTIVITY AND ALIGNMENT TO STATE NEEDS OF COMPLETERS Percentage & Number of 2014-15 Completers That Began Teaching in 2015-16 Percentage & Number of 2014-15 Completers That Obtained a License to Teach 400 100% 81% (n=13) Data Not Yet Available 2010-11 Completers Teaching in Public Schools in Louisiana in 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, & 2015-16 Number of Number & Number & Number & Number & Number & 2010-11 Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Completers Teaching in Teaching in Teaching in Teaching in Teaching in 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 100% (n=21) Data Not Yet available 91% (n=19) 91% (n=19) 91% (n=19) 95% (n=20) 95% (n=20) Assistance in the design of the Louisiana Teacher Preparation Dashboard was provided by the 2020 Key Effectiveness Indicators developed by Michael Allen, Edward Crowe, and Charles Coble, co-partners of Teacher Preparation Analytics 2017 LOUISIANA TEACHER PREPARATION DATA DASHBOARD (CONT’D) Southern University at New Orleans Prepared by Louisiana Board of Regents & Southern University System Certification-Only Alternate Teacher Preparation Program PERFORMANCE AS CLASSROOM TEACHERS (NEW TEACHERS WITH LESS THAN TWO YEARS OF TEACHING) Compass Student Outcome Mean & Number of Scores Impact on Mean Compass Student Outcome K-12 Students Score (2013-14, 2014-15, & 20153.0 16) and Number of Scores for All (n=55) (Please examine the 2017 New Teachers with Less than Two Louisiana Teacher Preparation Years of Teaching Data Fact Book to accurately Compass Teacher Effectiveness Levels for Student Outcome Scores Percentage and Number of 2013interpret the meaning of these Ineffective Effective Emerging Effective Proficient Highly Effective 14, 2014-15, & 2015-16 Compass scores.) Student Outcome Scores for the 6% 18% 33% 44% New Teachers by LDOE Teacher (n=≤10) (n=10) (n=18) (n=24) Effectiveness Levels Compass Professional Practice Mean & Number of Scores Demonstrated Teaching Mean Compass Professional Skill Practice Score (2013-14, 2014-15, 3.0 & 2015-16) and Number of Scores (n=55) (Please examine the 2017 for All New Teachers with Less than Louisiana Teacher Preparation Two Years of Teaching Data Fact Book to accurately Compass Teacher Effectiveness Levels for Professional Practice Scores Percentage and Number of 2013interpret the meaning of these Ineffective Effective Emerging Effective Proficient Highly Effective scores.) 14, 2014-15, & 2015-16 Compass 0% 18% 60% 22% Professional Practice Scores for the (n=≤10) (n=10) (n=33) (n=12) New Teachers by LDOE Teacher Effectiveness Levels Compass Final Evaluation Mean & Number of Scores Overall Impact and Mean Compass Final Evaluation Demonstrated Teaching Score (2013-14, 2014-15, & 20153.1 Skill 16) and Number of Scores for New (n=55) Teachers with Less than Two Years (Please examine the 2017 of Teaching Louisiana Teacher Preparation Compass Teacher Effectiveness Levels for Final Evaluation Scores Percentage and Number of 2013Data Fact Book to accurately Ineffective Effective Emerging Effective Proficient Highly Effective 14, 2014-15, & 2015-16 Compass interpret the meaning of these 2% 20% 49% 29% scores.) Final Evaluation Scores for the New (n=≤10) (n=11) (n=27) (n=16) Teachers by LDOE Teacher State Value Added Scores for New Teachers in Grades 4-8 with Less than Two Years of Teaching by Content Areas (Ten or More New Teachers) (Please examine the 2017 Louisiana Teacher Preparation Data Fact Book to accurately interpret the meaning of these scores.) Effectiveness Levels Content Areas Mean, Number of Scores, & Effectiveness Levels for Value-Added Scores of Ten or More New Teachers with Less Than Two Years of Teaching who Taught During 2013-14/2014-15/2015-16 Mathematics N/A (n=N/A) (Taught During 2014-15 & 2015-16) Ineffective Effective Emerging Effective Proficient Highly Effective N/A% (n=N/A) N/A% (n=N/A) N/A% (n=N/A) N/A% (n=N/A) Science (Taught During 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16) N/A (n=N/A) Ineffective Effective Emerging Effective Proficient Highly Effective N/A% (n=N/A) N/A% (n=N/A) N/A% (n=N/A) N/A% (n=N/A) Social Studies (Note: Data not available – new assessments being developed.) N/A Ineffective Effective Emerging Effective Proficient Highly Effective N/A N/A N/A N/A English/Language Arts/Reading N/A (n=N/A) (Taught During 2014-15 & 2015-16) Ineffective Effective Emerging Effective Proficient Highly Effective N/A% (n=N/A) N/A% (n=N/A) N/A% (n=N/A) N/A% (n=N/A)