University of North Texas Univ Complete

University of North Texas University Performance - Complete Report University of North Texas Accountability Report January 2016 Accountability System, January 2016 of 23 University of North Texas University Performance - Complete Report Participation - Key Measures Enrollment Fall headcount (unduplicated) Fall 2000 Total* White African American Hispanic Asian International Other Fall 2014 Fall 2015 27,054 36,164 37,175 19,026 (70.3%) 18,795 (52.0%) 18,669 (50.2%) 2,503 (9.3%) 4,973 (13.8%) 5,099 (13.7%) 2,118 (7.8%) 7,062 (19.5%) 7,756 (20.9%) 1,045 (3.9%) 2,011 (5.6%) 2,068 (5.6%) 1,392 (5.1%) 1,990 (5.5%) 2,226 (6.0%) 970 (3.6%) 1,333 (3.7%) 1,357 (3.7%) Flex Entry 64 Source: Coordinating Board Management (CBM) Report 001 % Institutional Closing the Change Closing the Gaps Fall Gaps Completion 2000 to TargetFall Fall 2015 2015 37.4% 40,087 92.7% - 1.9% 23,582 79.2% 103.7% 5,349 95.3% 266.2% 6,488 119.5% 97.9% 59.9% 39.9% 77 N/A Source: Coordinating Board Management (CBM) Report 001 Growth rates in the recent past have exceeded the target for headcount growth for the total group and for racial and ethnic subgroups The high rates of growth in racial and ethnic groups are especially encouraging Full-Time Equivalent Enrollment Fall semester credit hours (SCH) includes undergraduate(15), master's(12), doctoral(9), special-professional(12), and optometry(17) Fall 2000 Total FTSEs State-Funded FTSEs 20,515 20,479 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 28,758 28,131 29,882 29,392 % Change Fall 2000 to Fall 2015 45.7% 43.5% NOTE: The percentage change is based on the actual FTE numbers and may vary slightly from the calculation produced by the rounded numbers Post-baccalaureate students are counted separately from master’s for headcount enrollment and are counted with master’s for FTE enrollment calculations As with the headcount figures above, FTE increased and made it possible to exceed Emerging Research Group Targets Participation - Contextual Measures Fall 2000 First-time undergraduates from Texas top 10% and Texas top 11-25% Students in Texas top 10% Students in Texas top 11-25% First-time entering applicants accepted First-time accepted, enrolled Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Point Change Fall 2000 to Fall 2015 13.4% N/A 17.0% 32.3% 18.2% 32.5% 4.8 N/A 80.9% 71.3% 73.2% - 7.7 48.3% 39.7% 40.7% - 7.6 Additional applicant data is available at: http://www.txhighereddata.org/AppAccEnrInfo Accountability System, January 2016 of 23 University of North Texas University Performance - Complete Report FY 2000 Racial and ethnic composition of Texas public high school graduates White African American Hispanic Asian Other FY 2013 51.5% 12.9% 32.1% 3.2% 0.3% FY 2014 34.7% 12.9% 46.4% 4.0% 2.1% Point Change FY 2000 to FY 2014 34.2% 12.6% 46.8% 4.2% 2.2% -17.3 -0.3 14.7 1.0 1.9 UG Students by SCH taken at 2-year colleges UG Students by SCH taken at 2-year colleges Fall 2000 Fall UG Enrollment UG Students 0-12 hours 13-24 hours 25-29 hours 30-42 hours 43-59 hours 60-66 hours 67+ hours All Students with SCH at TX 2-Yr college Awarded Core Associate Degree Fall 2014 Fall UG Enrollment Rate Fall 2015 Rate Fall UG Enrollment Rate Point Change Fall 2000 to Fall 2015 21,059 3,947 1,529 517 1,318 1,638 759 2,646 (100%) (18.7%) (7.3%) (2.5%) (6.3%) (7.8%) (3.6%) (12.6%) 29,722 5,692 3,127 907 2,027 2,572 1,315 3,380 (100%) (19.2%) (10.5%) (3.1%) (6.8%) (8.7%) (4.4%) (11.4%) 30,503 5,762 3,172 868 2,057 2,665 1,328 3,450 (100%) (18.9% ) (10.4% ) (2.8% ) (6.7% ) (8.7% ) (4.4% ) (11.3% ) 0.2 3.1 0.3 0.4 0.9 0.8 - 1.3 12,354 (58.7%) 19,020 (64.0%) 19,302 (63.3% ) 4.6 (0.0%) 789 (2.7%) 800 (2.6% ) 2.6 1,385 (6.6%) 3,328 (11.2%) 3,616 (11.9% ) 5.3 For data about SCHs taken for dual credit by institution, go to http://www.txhighereddata.org/DualCreditData Fall 2000 Semester credit hours Total undergraduate semester credit hours Total graduate semester credit hours Percentage graduate SCH to total SCH 266,226 30,918 10.4 % Fall 2014 376,003 40,709 9.8 % Fall 2015 390,149 42,776 9.9% %/Point Change Fall 2000 to Fall 2015 46.5% 38.4% - 0.5 The decline in percent White among high school graduates is reflected in declining proportion of college enrollments for Whites This is a national demographic trend and reflects growth especially in the Hispanic population The other demographic changes among high school seniors will be reflected in future college going rate of minority students Accountability System, January 2016 of 23 University of North Texas University Performance - Complete Report Participation - Out-of-State Peers Out-of-state peer data is from the Fall 2014 IPEDS report and may not match accountability data because of differences in the source of the data Accountability measures are primarily derived from institutional data sent to the CB for CBM reports Data reported on this out-of-state peer link is obtained from the IPEDS system of institutional reporting to the federal government Data differences may result from different reporting periods and different definitions for the data elements University of North Texas Options Return to the Participation Page Download Excel Version Out-of-State Peer Measures and Definitions Emerging Research Group Out-of-State Peers Florida International University Institution's Out-of-State Peers Georgia State University University of Central Florida University of New Mexico-Main Campus University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus Headcount Enrollment Headcount enrolled for credit, disaggregated by race/ethnicity Total 36,486 49,610 32,556 60,767 27,844 27,261 17,907 5,683 10,788 33,293 10,762 16,363 African American 4,197 5,977 11,875 6,400 682 1,432 Hispanic 6,873 31,211 2,651 13,108 11,308 2,196 Asian 1,922 1,491 3,413 3,472 957 1,390 Other 5,587 5,248 3,829 4,494 4,135 5,880 30,553 38,863 27,488 48,385 23,056 23,447 White Full-Time Equivalent Enrollment Full-time equivalent for the institution The full-time equivalent of part-time enrollment is estimated by multiplying the part-time enrollment by factors that vary by control and level of institution and level of student Total Fall 2015 Enrollment Detail - University of North Texas Participation By 2015, close the gaps in participation rates across Texas to add 630,000 more students By Level, Age: Age Group Undergraduate Doctor's Research/ Scholarship Master's Professional Specialty PostBaccalaureate Total Under 18 18 to 21 22 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 34 35 and over 569 17,929 7,345 2,717 885 1,058 151 1,127 1,206 571 854 75 572 490 661 28 12 0 206 269 157 276 571 18,093 8,781 4,776 2,105 2,849 Total 30,503 3,910 1,803 44 915 37,175 32 PostBaccalaureate 500 119 129 55 69 43 44 915 By Level, Race/Ethnicity: White African American Hispanic Asian International Other 15,076 4,516 7,000 1,820 954 1,137 2,162 333 488 119 687 121 Doctor's Research/ Scholarship 899 129 135 71 514 55 Total 30,503 3,910 1,803 Ethnicity Undergraduate Master's Accountability System, January 2016 Professional Specialty Total 18,669 5,099 7,756 2,068 2,226 1,357 37,175 of 23 University of North Texas University Performance - Complete Report By Level, Gender: Male Female 14,696 15,807 Doctor's Research/ Scholarship 1,528 897 2,382 906 Total 30,503 3,910 Gender Undergraduate Master's Professional Specialty 1,803 36 PostBaccalaureate 362 553 44 915 Total 17,491 19,684 37,175 By Undergraduate Status: 4,460 4,269 191 African American 2,026 679 4,036 3,107 929 1,964 22,007 17,366 4,641 30,503 24,742 5,761 Undergraduate First-Time in College First-Time Transfer (from two- and four-year institutions) Other Undergraduate Total Full-time Part-time White Hispanic Asian Other Male Female 1,241 266 248 2,045 2,415 616 942 198 316 1,905 2,131 11,086 3,221 4,817 1,356 1,527 10,746 11,261 15,076 4,516 7,000 1,820 2,091 14,696 15,807 Fall 2015 Enrollment Detail - University of North Texas Participation By 2015, close the gaps in participation rates across Texas to add 630,000 more students Lower-Division Upper Division Undergraduate SCH SCH SCH Total State-Funded 233,340 232,074 156,809 150,723 Doctor's Research/ Scholarship SCH Master's SCH 390,149 382,797 31,087 31,087 Professional Specialty SCH 11,073 11,073 Optometry SCH 616 616 Total SCH 0 FTSE 432,925 425,573 29,882 29,392 Total SCH FTSE Distance Education Semester Credit Hours Lower-Division SCH Hybrid/Blended on campus Fully-distance education/Internet Upper Division SCH Undergraduate SCH Master's SCH Doctor's Research/ Scholarship SCH Professional Specialty SCH Optometry SCH 1,252 1,747 2,999 0 20,747 23,823 44,570 10,150 575 0 Accountability System, January 2016 3,005 200 55,295 3,881 of 23 University of North Texas University Performance - Complete Report Success - Key Measures Graduation Rate: 4-, 5-, and 6-Year First-time, full-time entering, degree-seeking, students enrolled in a minimum of 12 SCH their first fall semester who have graduated from the same institution or another Texas public or independent institution FY 2000 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Entering Entering Entering Entering Fall Cohort Rate Fall Cohort Rate Fall Cohort Rate Fall Cohort Rate Cohort Cohort Cohort Cohort 4-Year graduation rate Same institution Other TX institutions 5-Year graduation rate Same institution Other TX institutions 6-Year graduation rate Same institution Other TX institutions 1996 2,268 13.4% 11.0% 2.4% 1995 2,137 35.6% 28.0% 7.5% 1994 1,999 46.6% 36.0% 10.7% 2009 3,222 30.9% 28.4% 2.5% 2008 3,423 50.9% 44.3% 6.6% 2007 3,473 58.1% 49.6% 8.4% 2010 3,454 30.9% 29.0% 1.9% 2009 3,222 51.3% 45.8% 5.5% 2008 3,423 59.5% 50.6% 8.9% 2011 3,781 31.0% 29.1% 1.8% 2010 3,454 50.5% 46.0% 4.5% 2009 3,222 59.1% 51.3% 7.8% Point Change FY 2000 to FY 2015 17.6 18.1 - 0.6 14.9 18.0 - 3.0 12.5 15.3 - 2.9 For more information on the 6-year graduation rate, see: http://www.txhighereddata.org/GradRates Source: CBM001,CBM002, and CBM009 UNT continues to work to increase its graduation rates and encourage students to finish in four years The introduction of the Eagle Express plan is one such innovative approach and adoption of this option exceeded initial projections Degrees and certificates awarded 10 Number of degrees and certificates awarded FY 2000 FY 2014 FY 2015 % Change FY 2000 to FY 2015 Total Degrees* White African American Hispanic Asian International Other 4,776 3,720 290 317 152 264 33 8,052 4,732 862 1,291 371 522 274 8,105 4,582 993 1,370 364 533 263 69.7% 23.2% 242.4% 332.2% 139.5% 101.9% 697.0% Level Associates Baccalaureate Master's Doctor's Research/Scholarship Doctor's Professional Practice N/A 3,457 1,152 167 N/A N/A 6,158 1,603 284 N/A 6,261 1,564 270 10 N/A 81.1% 35.8% 61.7% N/A Certificates Upper-level certificates Post-baccalaureate certificates N/A N/A N/A 12 N/A N/A N/A Institutional Closing the Gaps TargetFY 2015 Closing the Gaps Completion 7,102 N/A 88.2% 263 102.7% *Hispanic students, except international ones, are counted as Hispanic Students who are "Multi-Racial one of which is African American" are included with the African American students Asian includes Asian, Hawaiian, and Pacific Islanders "Other" includes American Indian, Alaskan Native, Unknown, and two or more races, excluding African American International students are shown as a separate category Gender Male Accountability System, January 2016 1,987 3,589 3,562 79.3% of 23 University of North Texas University Performance - Complete Report Male Female 1,987 2,789 3,589 4,463 3,562 4,543 Source: CBM009 79.3% 62.9% Source: CBM009 The growth rates for degrees earned has been significant since 2000 Noteworthy is the dramatic improvement in the number of degrees earned by Hispanics (over 330% increase) Masters enrollment has dipped in several key areas impacted by local policy (funding in teaching education Masters programs has declined) This decline is having a spillover impact on Masters degree production as less candidates are enrolling 11 Undergraduate degrees to at-risk students FY 2000 FY 2014 1,357 Undergraduate Degrees to At-Risk Students 4,014 FY 2015 Change FY 2000 to FY 2015 3,889 2,532 Institutional Closing the Gaps TargetFY 2015* 150 150 35 45 Closing the Gaps Completion* 380 98.2% Closing the Gaps Critical Fields: STEM Awards 12 Degrees awarded in STEM fields FY 2000 Computer Science* Engineering* Math* Physical Science* Level Associate's Baccalaureate Master's Doctor's Research/Scholarship FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 % Change FY 2000 to FY 2015 60 18 21 11 83 144 70 39 92 208 57 41 88 180 69 36 46.7% 900.0% 228.6% 227.3% 110 98 29 336 244 48 398 235 63 373 262 62 N/A 239.1% 167.3% 113.8% 58.7% 120.0% 197.1% 80.0% * Includes baccalaureate and associate degrees Computer Science appears to be in a position of gaining ground but has not yet reached targets Consumer choice is impacting this datapoint however UNT's College of Engineering is seeing increased growth in its new Engineering majors This will increase the resulting degrees to be awarded in the future The recent approval to offer a new Ph.D in Mechanical and Energy Engineering will also further drive this pattern Math continues to perform strong and is exceeding Closing the Gaps targets Nursing and Allied Health 13 Degrees and certificates awarded in nursing FY 2000 Total Nursing Degrees Certificate Associates Baccalaureate Master's Doctor's Research/Scholarship Doctor's Professional Practice FY 2013 0 0 0 FY 2014 0 0 0 FY 2015 0 0 0 % Change FY 2000 to FY 2015 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Institutional Closing the Gaps TargetFY 2015* Closing the Gaps Completion* N/A * Includes baccalaureate and associate degrees and certificates Accountability System, January 2016 of 23 University of North Texas University Performance - Complete Report * Includes baccalaureate and associate degrees and certificates 14 Degrees and certificates awarded in allied health FY 2000 Total Allied Health Degrees Certificate Associates Baccalaureate Master's Doctor's Research/Scholarship Doctor's Professional Practice FY 2013 158 0 86 72 0 FY 2014 260 0 159 91 10 FY 2015 253 0 165 81 % Change FY 2000 to FY 2015 237 0 162 65 10 50.0% N/A N/A 88.4% - 9.7% N/A N/A Institutional Closing the Gaps TargetFY 2015* Closing the Gaps Completion* 100 162% * Includes baccalaureate and associate degrees and certificates UNT has limited programs in allied health areas and no nursing program This is a state need that must be borne primarily by other institutions Teacher Production and Certification 15 Students taking and passing the certification exams for teacher education FY 2012 Total number taking exam Race/Ethnicity White African American Hispanic Other Gender Male Female Total percent passing exam Race/Ethnicity White African American Hispanic Other Gender Male Female FY 2013 FY 2014 989 1,023 818 704 90 147 48 695 91 174 63 557 64 163 34 184 805 182 840 177 641 97.0% 95.0% 97.0% 99.0% 88.0% 94.0% 96.0% 98.0% 85.0% 92.0% 92.0% 98.0% 92.0% 96.0% 94.0% 97.0% 98.0% 97.0% 95.0% 97.0% 97.0% Note: The data for teacher production and certification was provided by SBEC In some cases, the sum of the categories does not add up to the total Numbers less than 10 in a category are suppressed Data for the most recent year shown may be incomplete In the face of employment shifts and fewer positions available,UNT has been and expects to continue to be one of the larger teacher education programs in the state The program has enjoyed a high pass rate The Program continues to work with it graduates to help ensure success on the certification exam UNT is also embracing its opportunity to train future Hispanic teachers given the population shift occurring in our K-12 classrooms Graduation and Persistence Rate: 6-Year 16 First-time, full-time students enrolled in a minimum of 12 SCH their first fall semester who have graduated or are still enrolled at the same institution or another Texas public or independent institution Total Same institution Other TX institutions White Same institution Other TX institutions African American Same institution Other TX institutions Hispanic Same institution Other TX institutions Asian Same institution Other TX institutions FY 2000 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Point Change Entering Entering Entering Entering FY Fall Cohort Rate Fall Cohort Rate Fall Cohort Rate Fall Cohort Rate 2000 to Cohort Cohort Cohort Cohort FY 2015 1994 1,999 61.9% 2007 3,473 68.1% 2008 3,423 69.9% 2009 3,222 67.9% 6.0 42.5% 54.0% 55.6% 55.3% 12.8 19.4% 14.1% 14.3% 12.5% - 6.9 1994 1,523 62.4% 2007 2,250 70.0% 2008 2,217 70.8% 2009 1,936 69.5% 7.1 43.9% 55.2% 56.8% 56.5% 12.6 18.6% 14.9% 14.0% 13.1% - 5.5 1994 172 62.8% 2007 536 64.2% 2008 442 69.2% 2009 492 62.8% 0.0 50.0% 53.9% 54.5% 51.6% 1.6 12.8% 10.3% 14.7% 11.2% - 1.6 1994 135 57.0% 2007 397 66.0% 2008 496 68.3% 2009 542 67.9% 10.9 31.9% 51.1% 53.0% 55.2% 23.3 25.2% 14.9% 15.3% 12.7% - 12.5 1994 123 65.9% 2007 201 73.6% 2008 187 78.6% 2009 169 72.8% 6.9 28.5% 56.7% 59.4% 58.6% 30.1 37.4% 16.9% 19.3% 14.2% - 23.2 Accountability System, January 2016 of 23 University of North Texas University Performance - Complete Report Other 1994 46 43.5% 2007 89 39.3% Same institution 39.1% 30.3% Other TX institutions 4.3% 9.0% For more information on the 6-year graduation rate, see: http://www.txhighereddata.org/GradRates 2008 81 35.8% 33.3% 2.5% 2009 83 49.4% 45.8% 3.6% 5.9 6.7 - 0.7 Source: CBM001, CBM002 and CBM009 There have been encouraging improvements in graduation rates among Hispanics and Asian ethnic groups We believe the decline in the six-year graduation rate for African-Americans and Whites to be an isolated occurrence We expect these groups' graduation rates to continue to improve over the years to come Success - Contextual Measures Fall 2000 97.4% 17 Enrollment: Percent of first-time students 19 and under Fall 2000 Fall 2000 21 Persistence rate of first-time, degree-seeking undergraduates: Two-Year Total Same institution Other TX institutions White Accountability System, January 2016 Fall 2012 35.6% Fall 2014 4.2% 19 Part-time first-time, degree seeking, undergraduates Total Same institution Other TX institutions White Same institution Other TX institutions African American Same institution Other TX institutions Hispanic Same institution Other TX institutions Asian Same institution Other TX institutions Other Same institution Other TX institutions 98.2% 18.8% 18 Financial Aid: Percent of students receiving Pell Grants 20 Persistence rate of first-time, degree-seeking undergraduates: One-Year Fall 2014 3.8% Fall 2015 98.4% Fall 2013 36.3% Fall 2015 4.3% Point Change Fall 2000 to Fall 2015 1.0 Point Change Fall 2000 to Fall 2013 17.5 Point Change Fall 2000 to Fall 2015 0.1 Entering Cohort Fall 2000 Cohort Rate 2,845 86.5% 67.7% 18.7% 2,003 87.3% 68.0% 19.2% 357 85.7% 69.7% 16.0% 272 85.3% 63.2% 22.1% 123 91.1% 73.2% 17.9% 90 68.9% 58.9% 10.0% Entering Cohort Fall 2013 Cohort Rate 4,175 86.3% 76.5% 9.8% 2,052 85.5% 76.0% 9.5% 646 85.8% 75.5% 10.2% 1,047 87.3% 75.6% 11.7% 216 90.3% 83.8% 6.5% 214 86.4% 81.3% 5.1% Entering Cohort Fall 2014 Cohort Rate 4,085 87.2% 77.6% 9.6% 1,980 86.1% 77.5% 8.6% 610 89.2% 80.7% 8.5% 1,052 89.2% 76.9% 12.3% 236 89.4% 80.5% 8.9% 207 79.2% 69.1% 10.1% Point Change Fall 2000 to Fall 2014 Entering Cohort Fall 2000 Cohort Rate 2,845 81.0% 59.4% 21.6% 2,003 80.6% Entering Cohort Fall 2012 Cohort Rate 4,184 78.7% 65.5% 13.2% 2,154 79.4% Entering Cohort Fall 2013 Cohort Rate 4,165 79.8% 67.3% 12.5% 2,047 78.8% Point Change Fall 2000 to Fall 2013 0.7 9.9 - 9.1 - 1.2 9.5 - 10.6 3.5 11.0 - 7.5 3.9 13.7 - 9.8 - 1.7 7.3 - 9.0 10.3 10.2 0.1 - 1.2 7.9 - 9.1 - 1.8 of 23 University of North Texas University Performance - Complete Report White Same institution Other TX institutions African American Same institution Other TX institutions Hispanic Same institution Other TX institutions Asian Same institution Other TX institutions Other Same institution Other TX institutions 2,003 357 272 123 90 80.6% 58.5% 22.1% 83.2% 65.5% 17.6% 83.1% 57.0% 26.1% 87.8% 68.3% 19.5% 65.6% 51.1% 14.4% Developmental Education 22 The percent of underprepared and prepared students who successfully complete a college-level course in math, reading and writing Prepared students are given year 2,154 641 1,019 185 185 Data by Subject Area Met Standard Math Reading Writing Did Not Meet Standard Math Reading Writing Unknown** (waived or military exemption) Math** Reading** Writing** Most- and Least-Prepared Populations Met State Standard in All Three Areas Math Reading Writing Did Not Meet Standard in All Three Areas Math Reading Writing 2,047 78.8% 66.5% 12.3% 80.3% 70.0% 10.2% 81.2% 66.4% 14.8% 85.2% 70.8% 14.4% 74.3% 66.8% 7.5% 644 1,044 216 214 - 1.8 8.0 - 9.8 - 2.9 4.5 - 7.4 - 1.9 9.4 - 11.3 - 2.6 2.5 - 5.1 8.7 15.7 - 6.9 Fall 2011 Cohort Total/Area Counts (a) Received credit pre-matriculation (b) Underprepared students are given years Summary Data Number of FTIC students Met state standards in all three areas Did not meet state standards in one, two, or all three areas (at entry) Unknown* (unduplicated) 79.4% 66.3% 13.1% 76.6% 63.2% 13.4% 79.9% 66.5% 13.3% 83.8% 66.5% 17.3% 65.4% 56.2% 9.2% College level course completion (grade A, B, or C) (c) College level course completion (grade A, B, C) including pre-matriculation credit (percent of total) (b+c)/(a) 3,908 3,583 301 24 3,740 3,743 3,719 612 1,266 1,083 1,102 1,889 1,918 45.8% 84.3% 80.7% 144 141 165 N/A N/A N/A 28 117 110 19.4% 83.0% 66.7% 24 24 24 N/A N/A N/A 9 12.5% 37.5% 37.5% 3,583 3,583 3,583 610 1,239 1,061 1,069 1,805 1,846 46.9% 85.0% 81.1% 27 27 27 N/A N/A N/A 24 19 29.6% 88.9% 70.4% The data for this accountability measure is tracked for one year for students who met TSI and for one, two, and three years for students who did not meet TSI for this report *The Unknown (unduplicated) category does not include students who are unknown in some areas and not met in others **Unknowns by area include students with waivers or exemptions who have not been reported as meeting TSI on a performance measure; FTIC students with waivers or military exemptions who were reported as meeting TSI in all areas based on performance measures are included in the "met state standards in all areas" category Fall 2011 Cohort 23 Underprepared students who satisfied TSI obligation within years Summary Data Number of FTIC students Met state standards in all three areas Did not meet state standards in one, two, or all three areas (at entry) Unknown* (unduplicated) Total/Area Counts (a) Percent TSI TSI TSI attempting TSI obligations Number obligations obligations developmental obligations met (percent attempting met (of those met (percent education met through of those developmental attempting of total as (includes any means (of attempting education developmental reported by DevEd total) developmental (b) education) institution) interventions) (e) education) (d) (e/a) (b/a) (d/b) TSI obligations met based on TSI reporting or passed 1st college-level course (percent of total) (e) and/or Passed†/(a) 3,908 3,583 301 24 Data by Subject Area Met Standard Accountability System, January 2016 10 of 23 University of North Texas Math Reading Writing University Performance - Complete Report 3,740 3,743 3,719 85 2.3% 0.1% 0.2% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Did Not Meet Standard Math Reading Writing 144 141 165 127 88.2% 2.1% 3.0% 87 98 126 152 68.5% 66.7% 100.0% 68.1% 89.4% 92.1% 68.1% 92.2% 92.1% Unknown** (waived or military exemption) Math** Reading** Writing** 24 24 24 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 3,583 3,583 3,583 75 2.1% 0.1% 0.1% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 27 27 27 18 0 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 14 0 20 24 24 77.8% 0.0% 0.0% 74.1% 88.9% 88.9% 74.1% 92.6% 88.9% Most- and Least-Prepared Populations Met state standards in all areas Math Reading Writing Did Not Meet Standards in All Three Areas Math Reading Writing *The Unknown (unduplicated) category does not include students who are unknown in some areas and not met in others **Unknowns by area include students with waivers or exemptions who have not been reported as meeting TSI on a performance measure; FTIC students with waivers or military exemptions who were reported as meeting TSI in all areas based on performance measures are included in the "met state standards in all areas" category †Passed is the number of students who passed a first college-level course as shown on measure #22 Fall 2011 Cohort Number returning Percent returning (Fall 2012) (Fall 2012) (b) (b/a) Total (a) 24 Percent of students who return the following fall Summary Data Number of FTIC students Met state standards in all areas Did not meet state standards in one, two, or all three areas Did not meet state standards in all three areas Unknown* (unduplicated) 3,908 3,583 301 27 24 3,308 3,066 235 21 85 85.6% 78.1% 77.8% 29.2% Data by Subject Area Met Standard by Area Math Reading Writing 3,740 3,743 3,719 3,194 3,188 3,169 85.4% 85.2% 85.2% 144 141 165 107 113 132 74.3% 80.1% 80.0% 24 24 24 7 29.2% 29.2% 29.2% Did Not Meet Standard by Area Math Reading Writing Unknown** by Area (waived or military exemption) Math Reading Writing *The Unknown (unduplicated) category does not include students who are unknown in some areas and not met in others **Unknowns by area include students with waivers or exemptions who have not been reported as meeting TSI on a performance measure; FTIC students with waivers or military exemptions who were reported as meeting TSI in all areas based on performance measures are included in the "met state standards in all areas" category FY 2000 25 Graduation of two-year college students 1-29 SCH (before transfer) 30 SCH or more (before transfer) Source: CBM001 and CBM009 206 715 ( 38.5%) ( 45.3%) FY 2014 384 1,453 ( 49.8%) ( 57.4%) FY 2015 347 1,401 Point Change FY 2000 to FY 2015 ( 51.7%) ( 56.7%) 13.2 11.4 35.7% 36.8% 2.0 1.6 26 Percentage of baccalaureate graduates by SCH completed at two-year colleges: 1-29 SCH (at any time) 30 SCH or more (at any time) Source: CBM001 and CBM009 33.7% 35.2% Cohort 36.1% 36.7% Rate Cohort Rate Cohort Rate 27 Graduation Rates Accountability System, January 2016 11 of 23 University of North Texas University Performance - Complete Report 27 Graduation Rates Master's Doctoral Fall 1995 Fall 1990 65.3% 22.2% FY 2011 Fall 2009 Fall 2004 71.7% 49.8% FY 2013 Fall 2010 Fall 2005 FY 2014 71.6% 56.7% Point Change FY 2011 to FY 2014 Baccalaureate graduate success 28 Percent of baccalaureate graduates who are employed or enrolled in a Texas graduate 77.6% 78.2% 77.8% 0.2 program or professional school FY 2011 FY 2013 FY 2014 Point Change FY 2011 to FY 2014 Baccalaureate Graduates Employment/Enrollment Status 29 Employed in 4th quarter in which program year ends 30 In graduate or professional school in Texas in fall of the next FY 31 Employed in Texas and enrolled in a graduate or professional school in Texas 67.6% 69.1% 69.2% 1.6 4.9% 4.6% 4.0% - 0.9 5.1% 4.5% 4.5% - 0.6 For more detailed information on enrollments and employment of graduates and other leavers, go to: http://www.txhighereddata.org/exitcohorts UNT graduates are expected to be competitive in the job market It should be noted that not all graduates stay in the state to work, and because employment in small firms is not included, this measure generally understates the actual success of graduates Fall 2000 FTSE/ FY 2001 UG Degrees Fall 2013 FTSE/ FY 2014 UG Degrees Fall 2014 FTSE/ FY 2015 UG Degrees 32 Undergraduate efficiency ratio Ratio of Undergraduate FTSE to Undergraduate N/A 4.03 4.00 Baccalaureate Degrees Awarded UNT continues to improve the course completion rate Accountability System, January 2016 12 of 23 University of North Texas Accountability System, January 2016 University Performance - Complete Report 13 of 23 University of North Texas University Performance - Complete Report Emerging Research Group Out-of-State Peers University of North Texas Institution's Out-of-State Peers Florida International University Georgia University of State Central University Florida University of New Mexico-Main Campus University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus Graduation Rate: Four, five, and six-year graduation rates of first-time, full-time degree seeking undergraduates 4-Year Rate 26% 24.0% 22.0% 40.0% 15.0% 37.0% 5-Year Rate 44% 45.0% 46.0% 63.0% 37.0% 62.0% 6-Year Rate 50% 54.0% 53.0% 70.0% 47.0% 67.0% Total Degrees 8,475 11,823 7,476 15,768 5,575 6,079 White 4,985 1,582 3,170 9,309 2,521 3,781 837 1,325 2,194 1,550 117 364 1,265 7,039 524 2,924 1,983 373 Asian 396 356 718 852 197 286 Other 992 1,521 870 1,133 757 1,275 Degrees Awarded: Number of graduates by level, race/ethnicity and gender African American Hispanic Level Associates 45 478 0 Bachelors 6,315 8,069 4,741 12,372 3,692 3,913 Master's 1,633 3,159 2,118 2,539 1,308 1,693 270 159 171 266 231 210 255 264 90 288 141 Male 3,656 4,873 3,046 6,598 2,368 3,037 Female 4,819 6,950 4,430 9,170 3,207 3,042 Doctor's Research/Scholarship Doctor's Professional Practice Gender Graduation Rate: Percent of first-time, degree-seeking undergraduates who have graduated after six academic years Total 50.0% 54.0% 53.0% 70.0% 48.0% 67.0% White 51.0% 49.0% 50.0% 70.0% 52.0% 69.0% African American 47.0% 45.0% 56.0% 67.0% 39.0% 61.0% Hispanic 47.0% 56.0% 55.0% 70.0% 46.0% 60.0% Asian 53.0% 59.0% 55.0% 67.0% 50.0% 78.0% American Indian or Alaska Native 25.0% 25.0% 17.0% 55.0% 29.0% 53.0% Unknown 67.0% 69.0% 51.0% 70.0% 48.0% N/A Nonresident Alien 56.0% 61.0% 55.0% 61.0% 62.0% 67.0% Computer Science 282 257 381 362 65 67 Engineering 250 617 962 276 430 Math 69 23 51 87 76 53 Physical Science 56 81 105 61 77 123 Total Degrees 271 909 395 1,649 426 Certificate 14 Associates 0 0 0 181 540 171 1,383 259 81 304 179 226 127 0 5 Graduates in Key Fields : Number of degrees awarded in specific fields by level Nursing and Allied-Health Graduates : Number of degrees awarded in nursing/allied-health by level Bachelors Master's Doctor's Research/Scholarship Accountability System, January 2016 14 of 23 University of North Texas University Performance - Complete Report Graduates Detail (FY 2015 )- University of North Texas Success By 2015, increase by 50 percent the number of degrees, certificates, and other identifiable student successes from high quality programs By Level, Race/Ethnicity: Race/Ethnicity Doctor's Doctor's Associate's Bachelor's Master's Research/ Professional Total Scholarship Practice White African American Hispanic Asian International Other Accountability System, January 2016 0 0 0 3,578 844 1,164 300 162 213 857 137 180 49 304 37 142 12 23 14 66 13 1 4,582 993 1,370 364 533 263 15 of 23 University of North Texas University Performance - Complete Report Excellence - Key Measures Faculty Teaching Fall 2000 Fall 2013 40.8% 33 Tenured/tenure-track faculty teaching lower-division SCH Fall 2014 26.3% Point Change Fall 2000 to Fall 2014 26.4% - 14.4 With the number of tenured/tenure-track faculty numbers lagging behind enrollment increases, it is necessary to rely on non-tenure-track faculty to serve a growing population of students Student/Faculty Ratio 34 Full-time student equivalents (FTSE) divided by full-time equivalent (FTE) faculty Fall 2000 FTSE/FTFE Ratio FTSE FTFE 20,515 883 Fall 2013 Ratio FTSE FTFE 23:1 28,575 1,201 Fall 2014 Ratio FTSE FTFE 24:1 28,758 991 % Change Fall Ratio 2000 to Fall 2014 29:1 25.1% Strong increases in enrollment have outpaced the ability to hire additional full-time faculty Declines in academic budgets has made it difficult to maintain the numbers of Tenure/Tenure-Track FTE Faculty State and National Exams Success 35 Certification and licensure rates FY 2000 Law Pharmacy Nursing Engineering N/A N/A N/A N/A FY 2014 FY 2015 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Point Change FY 2012 to FY 2015 N/A N/A N/A N/A UNT does not have law, pharmacy, or nursing programs Tenured/Tenure-Track FTE Faculty Fall 2000 73.7% 36 Percent of FTE teaching faculty who are tenured/tenure-track 63.6% Point Change Fall 2000 to Fall 2014 56.4% - 17.3 Declines in academic budgets has made it difficult to maintain the numbers of Tenure/Tenure-Track FTE Faculty Quality Enhancement Plan 37 Quality Enhancement Plan, Including Reaffirmation Year The Mission of the current UNT QEP is to transform the student-learning experience in large-enrollment undergraduate courses by engaging, encouraging, and enabling faculty to investigate and apply innovative instructional techniques These efforts are intended to enhance the University's overall instructional quality, improve student learning, and strengthen the efficiency of the learning and teaching process The primary goal of the QEP is to redesign a significant number of large-enrollment undergraduate course to improve student learning outcomes including course-specific and general course outcomes and to increase the amount of higher level learning 2015: UNT selected our QEP topic for Reaffirmation in 2016 Campus involvement at all levels was solicited On 11/14 President announced that "Soar Beyond The Classroom" would be our finalist Effort strengthens our commitment to educational excellence by allowing students to gain valuable career experience while learning Plan gives students more opportunities to interact with the surrounding community, solve problems and strengthen their critical thinking & communication Plan in final stages of submission to SACSCOC Excellent Programs 38 Excellent Programs Highlighted Excellent Programs VII.2 Semiconductor Research Corporation Center for Electronic Materials Processing and Integration (CEMPI) The Semiconducting Research Corporation (SRC) is a consortium of leading semiconductor manufacturers and equipment makers, including IBM, Intel, Texas Instruments, Applied Materials, Novellus Systems, Freescale, Global Foundries, Tokyo Electron Limited, Advanced Micro Devices, Mentor Graphics, and Rohm and Haas Electronic Materials The SRC supports university-based precompetitive resear Accountability System, January 2016 16 of 23 University of North Texas University Performance - Complete Report Highlighted Excellent Programs VII.4 Music and Jazz Studies The UNT College of Music is one of the nation’s finest comprehensive music schools North Texas graduates and faculty are exceptionally accomplished, and are consistently competitive at the highest levels of their chosen professions, often receiving Grammy nominations and other accolades Students in the College of Music have the opportunity to study with UNT’s highly acclaimed faculty of performers, composers, scholars and researchers To extend the prominence, UN Excellence - Contextual Measures Fall 2000 Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Point Change Fall 2000 to Fall 2014 39 FTE tenured/tenure-track faculty demographics Ethnicity Total 73.7% 63.6% 56.4%* - 17.3 White 73.1% 61.9% 54.2% - 18.9 African American 77.7% 65.5% 65.2% - 12.5 Hispanic 73.7% 60.7% 52.1% - 21.6 Asian 83.6% 85.1% 78.3% - 5.3 International N/A 65.2% 63.4% N/A Other 70.4% 46.7% 38.3% - 32.1 Gender Male 80.9% 74.7% 67.4% - 13.5 Female 59.7% 48.9% 42.8% - 16.9 *Hispanic faculty members, except international ones, are counted as Hispanic Faculty who are "Multi-Racial one of which is African American" are included with the African American faculty Asian includes Asian, Hawaiian, and Pacific Islanders "Other" includes American Indian, Alaskan Native, Unknown, and two or more races, excluding African American International faculty are shown as a separate category Faculty Rank Teaching Assistants Other Faculty Instructor Assistant Professor Associate Professor Professor 40 Faculty Rank (Fall 2014) Faculty Ethnicity Total* 416 841 138 312 310 White 265 628 77 199 234 African American 15 25 10 13 10 Hispanic 35 51 11 18 12 Asian 11 27 18 37 26 International 80 66 20 39 14 Other 10 44 14 Faculty Gender Male 211 350 78 189 237 Female 205 491 60 123 73 *Hispanic faculty members, except international ones, are counted as Hispanic Faculty who are "Multi-Racial one of which is African American" are included with the African American faculty Asian includes Asian, Hawaiian, and Pacific Islanders "Other" includes American Indian, Alaskan Native, Unknown, and two or more races, excluding African American International faculty are shown as a separate category Faculty Salary by Rank FY 2002 41 Faculty Salary Comparisons Professor Associate Professor Assistant Professor Instructor $76,255 $59,071 $49,047 $44,010 FY 2014 FY 2015 $109,362 $82,051 $66,159 $60,125 % Change FY 2002 to FY 2015 $113,950 $83,734 $69,359 $62,531 Fall 2000 42 Endowed Professorships and Chairs Percent unfilled Percent of total tenured/tenure-track faculty 49.4% 41.8% 41.4% 42.1% Fall 2014 National Average (FY 2015) $117,155 $83,243 $71,840 $49,231 Fall 2015 % National Average 97% 101% 97% 127% %/Point Change Fall 2000 to Fall 2015 10 24 24 140.0% 100.0% 1.5% 21.0% 3.1% 25.0% 3.1% - 75.0 1.6 43 Nobel Prize Winners and National Academies FY 2013 National Academy of Science National Academy of Engineering Academy of Arts and Sciences Accountability System, January 2016 FY 2014 FY 2015 1 % Change FY 2013 to FY 2015 0.0% - 50.0% -100.0% 17 of 23 University of North Texas University Performance - Complete Report 44 Other Faculty Awards FY 2013 Fulbright American Scholars Andrew W Mellon Foundation Distinguished Achievement Awards National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) Fellows NSF CAREER Award winners (excluding those who are also PECASE winners) University of North Texas Emerging Research Group Out-of-State Peers Florida International University FY 2014 FY 2015 1 0 % Change FY 2013 to FY 2015 - 50.0% N/A -100.0% N/A Institution's Out-of-State Peers Georgia State University University of University of New Central Mexico-Main Florida Campus University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus Tenure/Tenure-Track Faculty Percentage of all full-time faculty members who are tenured or tenure-track Percent of Tenured/Tenure-Track faculty 69% Accountability System, January 2016 60% 67% 61% 54% 80% 18 of 23 University of North Texas University Performance - Complete Report Research - Key Measures Federal and Private Research FY 2001 $16,771 45 Federal and private research expenditures per FTE faculty FY 2014 $27,232 FY 2015 $34,933 % Change FY 2001 to FY 2015 108.3% Research Expenditures FY 2001 FY 2014 $17.442 46 Research expenditures ($ Million) FY 2015 $29.397 % Change FY 2001 to FY 2015 $29.182 67.3% Institutional Closing the Gaps TargetFall 2015 Closing the Gaps Completion $30.330 96.2% Sponsored Research Funds FY 2011 FY 2014 10.6% 47 Federal and private (sponsored) research funds per revenue appropriations Source: THECB Annual Research Expenditures Report and Sources & Uses 15.8% FY 2015 Point Change FY 2011 to FY 2015 12.3% 1.7 Source: THECB Annual Research Expenditures Report and Sources & Uses Historically, UNT's strengths have been in disciplines with limited federal support opportunities, e.g., fine and performing arts, humanities, and professional programs such as MBA and MPA With the addition of engineering programs and an increased funding to stimulate research projects, research at UNT has witnessed a marked increase in research funding Research - Contextual Measures FY 2001 48 Research Expenditures by Source ($ Millions) Federal State Private Institutional Restricted Research Expenditures (amount shown is a subset of the categories above) For information on restricted research expenditures, go to http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/RDF FY 2009 49 Faculty holding extramural research grants Number Percent 188 22.8% FY 2001 FY 2014 FY 2015 % Change FY 2001 to FY 2015 $17.442 $29.397 $29.182 67.3% $8.284 $4.661 $2.623 $1.874 $16.319 $2.082 $4.486 $6.510 $15.470 $3.560 $4.063 $6.088 86.7% - 23.6% 54.9% 224.9% $11.740 $17.524 $16.097 37.1% FY 2013 205 23.56% FY 2013 FY 2014 191 23.01% FY 2014 FY 2015 194 23.37% FY 2015 % Change FY 2009 to FY 2015 3.2% 0.6 % Change FY 2001 to FY 2015 Patents Accountability System, January 2016 19 of 23 University of North Texas University Performance - Complete Report 50 Number of new U.S patents issued or reissued 51 Number of new patent applications 9 600.0% 25 34 125.0% UNT has increased its commitment to research by reallocating budget This ""pump priming"" is resulting in re-directing faculty efforts toward external grants and applications for new patents While new patents dipped slightly as compared to 2013, UNT has made intentional strides to introduce new patent applications that are of substantive quality as opposed to quantity The percent change from 2001 to present supports this re-alignment of priorities University of North Texas Emerging Research Group Out-of-State Peers Institution's Out-of-State Peers Florida International Georgia State University of University of New Mexico-Main University University Central Florida Campus University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus Research Expenditures Current year research expenditures Research Expenditures $27,536,295 $106,454,127 $128,463,850 $120,340,742 $197,544,068 $116,542,000 $25,941,756 $80,338,840 $53,424,107 $82,083,832 $189,067,209 $61,388,000 Research Funds Amount of sponsored (external/federal) research funds Federal Research Funds Source: IPEDS Fall 2014 Accountability System, January 2016 20 of 23 University of North Texas University Performance - Complete Report Institutional Efficiency and Effectiveness - Key Measures Administrative Cost FY 2000 FY 2014 8.1% 52 Administrative costs as a percent of operating budget FY 2015 5.1% Point Change FY 2000 to FY 2015 7.1% - 1.0 UNT has a longstanding tradition of low administrative costs After an increase that reflected the university's efforts to replace a 30-year old legacy computing system with a modern, web enabled, data-base centered Enterprise Information System (EIS), the university has been able to maintain its reduced level of administrative cost for the past two years Space Usage Efficiency (SUE) 53 Space usage efficiency measure of the effectiveness and efficiency of existing teaching space utilization Classroom and lab passing score is 75 and overall passing score is 150 Fall 2014 Classroom space use efficiency Lab space use efficiency Overall space use efficiency Fall 2015 92 100 192 92 100 192 UNT, has historically sought to offer classes to best accommodate the work schedules of students As the university adjusts to the increasingly residential nature of our students and students become available to enroll in courses at times shunned by commuters, UNT has increased it's classroom utilization rate Appropriated Funds per FTE Faculty 54 State appropriations divided by full-time equivalent students and annual full-time equivalent teaching faculty FY 2001 Appropriated funds per FTE student Appropriated funds per FTE faculty FY 2014 $5,503 $59,210 $4,428 $46,582 FY 2015 $5,250 $70,085 % Change FY 2001 to FY 2015 - 4.6% 18.4% Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) FY 2000 55 HUB Expenditures without construction (Millions) Percent of total expenditures HUB Expenditures with construction (Millions) Percent of total expenditures FY 2014 FY 2015 %/Point Change FY 2000 to FY 2015 $ 4.109 $ 14.520 $ 8.779 113.7% 9.1% $ 5.730 12.7% 12.0% $ 20.369 16.8% 6.2% $ 22.687 16.1% - 2.9 295.9% 3.4 The UNT Board of Regents has encouraged the university to place greater effort on using HUB vendors These efforts are paying off as reflected in positive increases in total HUB expenditures as compared to FY 2000 HUB Administrative reports to each Department continues to improve activities to increase HUB usage Operating Expenses per FTE Student FY 2001 FY 2014 $11,392 56 Operating expenses per FTE student $16,319 FY 2015 $15,612 % Change FY 2001 to FY 2015 37.0% Total Revenue per FTE Student and FTE teaching Faculty FY 2000 57 Total revenue Per FTE student Per FTE faculty Accountability System, January 2016 $10,826 $113,486 FY 2014 $17,882 $188,099 FY 2015 $17,354 $231,680 % Change FY 2000 to FY 2015 60.3% 104.1% 21 of 23 University of North Texas University Performance - Complete Report UNT continues to see an increase in revenue per FTE Student and per FTE Faculty These are important gains in the relationship between operating expenses per FTE student and revenue generation per FTE student Institutional Efficiency and Effectiveness - Contextual Measures Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 %/Point Change Fall 2000 to Fall 2015 Class Size 46 45 46 0.0% 27 26 26 - 3.7% 24.3% 24.3% 24.1% - 0.2 18.2% 19.9% 20.2% 2.0 58 Average class size Median class size 59 Percentage of undergraduate classes with less than 20 students 60 Percentage of undergraduate classes with 50 students or more Rapid increases in enrollments, coupled with a recent legacy of a two-year lag in formula funding, has prevented UNT from reducing average class size With current gains in formula funding we anticipate impacting this metric in the coming year(s) We are utilizing new scheduling software and analysis tools to ensure the best use of classroom space while being sensitive to class size issues FY 2000 $3,404 61 Average cost of resident undergraduate tuition and fees for 30 SCH Fall 2000 62 E&G Square footage E&G classroom per FTE student E&G lab per FTE student 8.34 6.74 FY 2011 FY 2013 FY 2015 FY 2016 $10,066 Fall 2014 $10,480 Fall 2015 5.94 5.05 FY 2014 % Change FY 2000 to FY 2016 % Change Fall 2000 to Fall 2015 5.85 5.54 FY 2015 64 Quasi Endowment ($ millions) 65 Total Endowment ($ millions) 66 Total Endowment - Per FTE student FY 2001 67 Total Revenue* State appropriations Tuition and fees Federal grants and contracts Institutional resources Constitutional funds Total Revenue with Constitutional Funds *Does not include Constitutional Funds Link to additional information: http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/FRP/SU/ - 29.9% - 17.8% % Change FY 2011 to FY 2015 Endowment 63 True and Term Endowment ($ millions) 207.9% $82.0 $107.1 $118.1 $117.0 $20.0 $14.9 $14.8 $20.0 $102.0 $122.0 $132.9 $137.0 34.3% $3,411 $4,142 $4,468 $4,521 32.6% FY 2014 FY 2015 % Change FY 2001 to FY 2015 $262,538,356 $531,875,400 $525,816,151 100.3% $128,515,601 $79,429,003 $21,354,697 $33,239,055 $131,717,530 $236,918,876 $75,721,416 $87,517,578 $159,062,516 $243,175,730 $74,353,704 $49,224,201 23.8% 206.2% 248.2% 48.1% $18,021,033 $280,559,389 $27,846,476 $559,721,876 $27,846,476 $553,662,627 54.5% 97.3% UNT has refocused energy and strategy on enhancing advancement operations Gains in endowment are starting to materialize as the campus efforts in this arena continue to unfold University of North Texas Emerging Research Group Out-of-State Peers Florida International University Institution's Out-of-State Peers Georgia State University University of Central Florida University of New Mexico-Main Campus University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus Administrative Cost Ratio Accountability System, January 2016 22 of 23 University of North Texas University Performance - Complete Report Administrative Cost Ratio Amount expended for administrative costs as a percent of operative expenses Administrative costs as a percent of operating budget 3% 5% 3% 6% 2% 3% $4,285 $5,136 $5,950 $5,340 $11,084 $6,414 $8,373 $6,843 $7,241 $5,687 $11,745 $12,188 $8,076 $6,256 $7,171 $5,199 $5,411 $11,150 Appropriations State and local government appropriation revenues per FTE student Appropriations per FTE student Expenditures Instruction expenses per FTE student Instruction expenses per FTE student Tuition and Fees Tuition and Fee revenue per FTE student Tuition and Fee Revenue per FTE student Accountability System, January 2016 23 of 23 ... January 2016 12 of 23 University of North Texas Accountability System, January 2016 University Performance - Complete Report 13 of 23 University of North Texas University Performance - Complete Report... Group Out -of- State Peers University of North Texas Institution's Out -of- State Peers Florida International University Georgia University of State Central University Florida University of New Mexico-Main... University of North Texas Emerging Research Group Out -of- State Peers Florida International University Institution's Out -of- State Peers Georgia State University University of Central Florida University