TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES
PART I: INTRODUCTION
1. RATIONALE FOR THE STUDY
2. AIMS OF THE STUDY
3. RESEARCH QUESTIONS
4. SCOPE OF THE STUDY
I.5. METHODS OF THE STUDY
6. ORGANIZATION OF THE STUDY
PART II: DEVELOPMENT
CHAPTER 1: LITERATURE REVIEW
1.1. PROCESS APPROACH TO WRITING TEACHING
1.1.1. An overview of process approach
1.1.2. Stages in a writing proce
1.2. PEER FEEDBACK IN WRITING TEACHING
1.2.1. Concept of peer feedback in writing
1.2.2. The significance of peer feedback in process writing
1.2.3. Requirements for effective peer feedback practice in writing teaching
1.2.4. Major issues of student feedback on their peer’s writing
CHAPTER 2: METHODOLOGY
2.1. RESEARCH APPROACH
2.2. METHODS OF DATA COLLECTION
2.2.1. Survey
2.2.2. Student writing analysis
2.3. METHOD OF DATA ANALYSIS
CHAPTER 3: DATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
3.1. FINDINGS AND INTERPRETATIONS FROM STUDENT QUESTIONNAIRE
3.1.1. Current situation of peer written feedback
3.1.2. Students’ reactions to peer written feedback
3.2. FINDINGS AND INTERPRETATIONS FROM STUDENT WRITING ANALYSIS
3.2.1. Features of peer written feedback
3.2.2. Students’ post-feedback revision
PART III: CONCLUSION
1. SUMMARY OF THE STUDY
2. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS
2.1. How is peer feedback given to the 2nd- year students' writings at the FELTE, ULIS,
VNU?
2.2. How do the 2nd- year students react to their peers’ feedback on their writings?
2.3. What can be done to improve the effectiveness of peer feedback practice at the faculty?
2.3.1. Pre-training activity
2.3.2. Intervention activity
2.3.3. Post-feedback discussion with the whole group
2.3.4. Assessment of peer feedback
REFERENCES
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
APPENDIX 2
GUIDELINES FOR PEER EDITING
Untitled