What Went Wrong Part 4 potx

... indicators have been affect- ed by radiography being carried out on welds up to 70 m away. 74 What Went Wrong? 2.12 CONTROL OF MODIFICATIONS How can we prevent modifications from producing ... fall. 86 What Went Wrong? between them. Oxygen was also fed to the reactors, but the oxygen lines are not shown. At the time of the incident only two reactors, Nos. 1 and...

Ngày tải lên: 11/08/2014, 18:20

... space?, 241 1 I .9 Every possible error, 242 Chapter 12. Hazards of Common Materials . . . . a . . . . . 244 12.1 Compressed air, 244 12.2 Water, 246 12.3 Nitrogen, 248 12 .4 Heavy ... stacks, 140 6.3 Heat radiation. 142 Chapter7.Leaks 144 7.1 7.2 Control of leaks, 1 54 7.3 7 .4 Detection of leaks, 160 7.5 Fugitive emissions, 162 Some common sources of le...

Ngày tải lên: 11/08/2014, 18:20

... (Fig- ure 1-11, [16, 171. 8 What Went Wrong? Blowdown Blowdown Relief Valve RIGHT Relief Valve Open End -Blank @ Figure 1 -4. The right and wrong ways to isolate a vent ... 1-6 shows a thin slip-plate that has been subjected to a gauge pressure of 47 0 psi (32 bar). 4 What Went Wrong? There was another similarity to the first incident. In this ca...

Ngày tải lên: 11/08/2014, 18:20

... completed” [39]. 36 What Went Wrong? Figure 1-13. This steel box was quite incapable of containing a leak of steam at a gauge pressure of 300 psi (20 bar). 60 What Went Wrong? 2.6 PROCESS ... fly very far [38]. (See Sections 13.5 and 17.1 for the hazards of quick-opening lids.) 44 What Went Wrong? According to the report, the maintenance worker should have...

Ngày tải lên: 11/08/2014, 18:20

... 1 04 What Went Wrong? 4. 3 LABELING OF CHEMICALS 4. 3.1 Poor or Missing Labels One incident is described in Section ... of Zaragoza in December 1990, Translation No. 91-1 140 1 ( 849 8e/813e), International Atomic Energy Agency. 1991. 1 14 What Went Wrong? dioxide to remove the air, and the refrigerated butane ... 14 to 23 amps, was high enough to melt part...

Ngày tải lên: 11/08/2014, 18:20

... material. 144 132 What Went Wrong? was built more than 40 years earlier, and the combination of a full tank and a low temperature triggered the collapse. For most of the 40 years, the ... the dike wall was damaged by the 142 What Went Wrong? this reason, many companies prefer not to use them. If they are partly choked, burning liquid or particles of hot carbon may be...

Ngày tải lên: 11/08/2014, 18:20

... taking. 1 64 What Went Wrong? 13. British Occupational Hygiene Society, Fugitive Emissions of Vapo~~rs froin Process Equipment, Report in Science Reviews, Northwood, UK, 19 84. 14. C. R. ... November 19 84, was one of the worst incidents that has ever occurred in the oil and chemical industries, exceeded only by Bhopal. According to official figures, 542 people were ki...

Ngày tải lên: 11/08/2014, 18:20

... Workshop, Atomic Energy Authori- ty, Hanvell, UK, 19 84. 13. D. Clarke. The Chemical Engineer; No. 44 9, June 1988, p. 44 . 14. B. E. Mellin, Loss Prererzriorz Bulletin, No. 100, ... of 23 m; 14 tons of gasoline were spilled. Three hours later a further length collapsed. The pipe sup- ports were replaced by the type shown in Figure 9-5 (b). 2 04 What Went Wrong?...

Ngày tải lên: 11/08/2014, 18:20

... Rugby, UK, undated. Society. Lancashire and Cheshire Branch), No. 147 , Oct. 19 94. Oct. 1995, p. 244 . 220 What Went Wrong? A Impingement plate ‘7- Calandria f Figure 10-11. Condensate ... Safely Progress, Vol. 14, No. 4, 14. I. M. Duguid, Loss Prevention Bulletin, No. 1 34, Apr. 1997, p. 10. 15. R. E. Sanders, Process Safely Progress, Vol. 15, No. 4. Wi...

Ngày tải lên: 11/08/2014, 18:20

... 7. Petroleum Review, Apr. 1976. p. 241 . 2 54 What Went Wrong? tank should be deemed to be a confined space, and the entry proce- dure should apply. 4. All managers and supervisors should ... UK. 199 1. No. 1, Jan. 1990. p. 39. of Energy, Washington, D.C., Dec. 19 94. p. 6. 246 What Went Wrong? Thin films of oil in pipework can explode without a previous f...

Ngày tải lên: 11/08/2014, 18:20