Báo cáo toán học: "A Simple Proof of the Aztec Diamond Theorem" potx
... 1986. the electronic journal of combinatorics 12 (2005), #R18 8 Theorem 2.3 (Aztec diamond theorem) The number of domino tilings of the Aztec diamond of order n is 2 n(n+1)/2 . Remark: The proof of ... between domino tilings of an Aztec diamond and non- intersecting lattice paths, a simple proof of the Aztec diamond theorem is given by means of H...
Ngày tải lên: 07/08/2014, 08:22
Ngày tải lên: 05/08/2014, 09:46
... s 2 n . (1) where b(i) is the number of times the integer i occurs in the sequence T . Note that the sum of all b(i), 1 ≤ i ≤ n,isequaltol, the length of T . 3 A simple proof for the existence of exponentially balanced ... a power of two, there exists an n-bit totally balanced Gray code. Here, we shall present a proof using Theorem 2.1. The proof is constructiv...
Ngày tải lên: 07/08/2014, 08:22
Báo cáo toán học: "A Short Proof of the Rook Reciprocity" pps
... ···(x−n+1). Then we have the following reciprocity theorem. Theorem. For any board B ⊂ [d] × [d], R(B; x)=(−1) d R(B; − x − 1). The existing proofs derive this as a corollary of other reciprocity theorems, ... subset of [d] × [d](where[d]isdefinedtobe{1, 2, ,d})andtherook numbers r B k of a board are the number of subsets of B of size k such that no two elements have the sa...
Ngày tải lên: 07/08/2014, 06:20
Báo cáo toán học: "A Concise Proof of the Littlewood-Richardson Rule" pdf
... extension of the Littlewood-Richardson rule [Z]. Taking the specialization λ = , we obtain the decomposition of s µ/ν into Schur functions; it is simpler than the traditional formulation of the Littlewood-Richardson rule ... b i free k + 1’s in row i of T , then there should be b i free k’s and a i free k + 1’s in row i of σ k (T ). In the following, T ≥j denotes the s...
Ngày tải lên: 07/08/2014, 06:23
Báo cáo toán học: "A Combinatorial Proof of the Sum of q-Cubes" pptx
... number of boxes in the first row is equal to the size of the first part, the number of boxes in the second row is equal to the size of the second part, etc. For example, the Ferrers diagram for the ... that the set S consists of pairs of partitions with no primed parts. In the definition of φ −1 when there is a primed integer in the image, we consider only...
Ngày tải lên: 07/08/2014, 08:20
Báo cáo toán học: "A positive proof of the Littlewood-Richardson rule using the octahedron recurrence" pot
... of the hive give λ • the differences on the Northeast side of the hive give µ • the differences on the South side of the hive give ν where all differences are computed left-to-right throughout the ... vertex. The constant coordinate assigned is then the label on ∆ counterclockwise of the extra vertex, minus the label on ∆ clockwise of the extra vertex. The v...
Ngày tải lên: 07/08/2014, 08:20
Báo cáo toán học: "A Combinatorial Proof of the Log-concavity of a famous sequence counting permutations" potx
... me to the area of log-concave sequences. Abstract We provide a combinatorial proof for the fact that for any fixed n, the sequence {i(n, k )} 0≤k ≤ ( n 2 ) of the numbers of permutations of length ... i(p) of inversions, and the study of numbers i(n, k)ofn-permutations having k inversions, is a classic area of combinatorics. The best-known result is the following...
Ngày tải lên: 07/08/2014, 08:22
Báo cáo toán học: "Random Cayley graphs are expanders: a simple proof of the Alon–Roichman theorem" potx
... below, the elements of graph theory, representation theory, and probability theory required for the statement of the theorem and the subsequent proof. The exposition here is primarily for the purposes ... C the electronic journal of combinatorics 11 (2004), #R62 3 Random Cayley graphs are expanders: a simple proof of the Alon–Roichman theorem ZEPH LANDAU Departm...
Ngày tải lên: 07/08/2014, 08:20
Báo cáo toán học: "A short proof of a partition relation for triples" pdf
... [X] 4 exists. In the light of Theorems 2 and 3, a positive resolution of the following question would be the best improvement of Theorem 1 possible. Question 1. If X is an order with uncountable character, then ... short proof The following theorem first appeared in [3, Theorem 31, pp. 447–457]. (Actually, this is not quite true. The theorem there was claimed only for uncount...
Ngày tải lên: 07/08/2014, 06:20