Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 3 pot
... different meanings depending on whether it is used in a contractual or restitutionary sense. Viscount Simon in Fibrosa distinguished these meanings in the following manner: 13 in the law relating to ... the guilty party creates the right in the innocent party to rescind instead of a right in the guilty party to recover, which seems to be a preferable way to view the problem. If,...
Ngày tải lên: 05/08/2014, 13:20
... Littleboy (18 93) 13 TLR 39 9 52 Olin v. Reinecke (1929) 33 6 Illinois Rep 530 ; 168 NE 676 37 6 Olwell v. Nye & Nissen 1 73 P 2d 652 (Wash 1946); 26 wash 2d 282 34 8–50, 35 4, 510 Orakpo v. Manson Investments ... (1889) 16 R 37 3 559 Thorpe v. Fasey [1949] Ch 649 175 Tinsley v. Milligan [1994] 1 AC 34 0; [1992] Ch 31 0 295–8, 31 5, 31 6, 32 2 Tito v. Waddell (No. 2) [1977] C...
Ngày tải lên: 05/08/2014, 13:20
... see Kramer in: M ¨ unchener Kommentar, § 1 23, n. 33 ; and in Dutch law art. 3: 44(2) BW. 23 See Zweigert and K ¨ otz, Introduction, 428; Kramer in: M ¨ unchener Kommentar, § 1 23, n. 33 . In cases ... Mentally Ill in Negligence Actions’, (19 83) 93 Yale LJ 1 53, 155–6. 32 E.g., Breunig v. American Family Ins. Co. 1 73 NW 2d 619 (Wis 1970). 33 Restatement (Second) of Torts...
Ngày tải lên: 05/08/2014, 13:20
Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 2 doc
... Birks and W. Swadling, ‘Restitution’, [1998] All ER Annual Rev 39 0, 39 7 ff. 133 [1998] 3 WLR 1095 at 1146. P1: GKW CU074-Johnston CHAPTER- 03 October 9, 2001 23: 9 Char Count= 0 3 In defence of unjust ... [1876] 3 Ch 35 1; Maskell v. Horner [1915] 3 KB 106; Lord Goff in Woolwich Equitable Building Society v. IRC [19 93] AC 70 at 165. 61 See, e.g., Rogers v. Ingham [1876]...
Ngày tải lên: 05/08/2014, 13:20
Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 5 doc
... describes the unwinding of a mutual contract in its totality: A asks for restitutio in integrum and in order to be successful has to offer restitutio in integrum. Restitutio in integrum means that ... in law. Once again, therefore, illegality is operating as a defence, though this time it is found to have no application to the facts of the case in hand. 33 Above, 290. 34 [1...
Ngày tải lên: 05/08/2014, 13:20
Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 6 pptx
... Brownsword, Key Issues in Contract (1995), 200–2, 215, 217, 220, 2 23 5, 30 1 3; Roberto M. Unger, ‘The Critical Legal Studies Movement’, (19 83) 96 Harvard LR 561, 632 , 639 , 641–4; Hugh Collins, ‘The ... other party’s infringement. In the case of mistaken improvements, as in these other instances, the law will sometimes impose an unquantifiable hardship on an innocent party for...
Ngày tải lên: 05/08/2014, 13:20
Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 7 pptx
... consent: instead, the primary distinction is bet- ween performance by a third party with or without an interest in doing so. (a) Performance by interested third parties Where the third party whose ... performance against the debtor. 27 3. The ‘liberating effect’ of performance and recourse by the third party Article 1 236 sets out the ‘liberating effect’ of third-party performance, an issu...
Ngày tải lên: 05/08/2014, 13:20
Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 8 pps
... 86 SALJ 227 30 ; also his Verrykingsaanspreeklikheid in die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg (3rd edn, 1987), 33 9– 53; also his ‘Aspekte van Verrykingsaanspreeklikheid’, [1970] Acta Juridica 231 , 236 –41; also ... 0 enrichment in three-party situations 5 43 obliged, in terms of their contract with the developing company (T), to pay for all work done, including the electrical work. The court of fi...
Ngày tải lên: 05/08/2014, 13:20
Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 9 pdf
... 475; Kleinwort Benson Ltd v. Lincoln City Council [1999] 2 AC 34 9 at 37 2F, 37 7H; Airbus Industrie GIE v. Patel [1999] 1 AC 97 at 132 , 133 ; Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v. Islington London ... Fortier Inc. v. Caisse Populaire Desjardins de la Plaine [1998] RJQ 1221 at 1227, citing French doctrine. 110 [1999] 2 AC 34 9; [1998] 4 All ER 5 13. 111 The argument was built on point...
Ngày tải lên: 05/08/2014, 13:20
Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 10 doc
... theory’ in the condictio indebiti; 34 9 and (ii) recompense as the lineal descendant of the post-Justinianic actio de in rem verso in its original distinctive role as a remedy redressing indirect enrichment. 35 0 (a) ... Contracts, 736 –8. 235 Gallo, ‘Unjust Enrichment’, 444. 236 Code civil, art. 137 7; Codice civile, art. 2 036 . 237 Code civil, art. 137 6; Codice civile, art....
Ngày tải lên: 05/08/2014, 13:20