618 | Wolves and Ethical Perspectives Stolzenburg, W 2006 Us or Them Conservation in Practice, 7, 14–21 Treves, A., & Karanth, K U 2003 Humancarnivore conflict and perspectives on carnivore management worldwide Conservation Biology, 17, 1491–1499 U.S Department of Agriculture—Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service—Wildlife Services 2008a Wildlife Damage: Program Data Reports, 1996–2007 http://www.aphis usda.gov/wildlife_damage/prog_data_ report.shtml U.S Department of Agriculture—Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service—Wildlife Services 2008b FY 2007 Monitoring Report and Amendment to the EA for Management of Blackbird Species to Reduce Damage to Sunflower, Corn, and Other Small Grain Crops in the Prairie Pothole Region of North Dakota and South Dakota U.S Department of Agriculture—Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service—Wildlife Services 2007 Wildlife Services Stakeholder’s Newsletter: 2007 Fall Edition U.S Department of Agriculture—Office of Inspector General 2004a Audit Report: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services’ Controls Over Hazardous Materials Inventory U.S Department of Agriculture—Office of Inspector General 2004b Audit Report: Security Over Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service’s Owned and Leased Aircraft U.S Department of Agriculture—Office of Inspector General 2005 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Evaluation of the Implementation of the Select Agent or Toxin Regulations, Phase I Report No 336012-AT U.S Department of Agriculture—Office of Inspector General 2006 Audit Report: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Evaluation of the Implementation of the Select Agent or Toxin Regulations, Phase II Report No 33601-3-AT U.S Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Inspection Services “About APHIS.” U.S General Accounting Office 1995 Animal Damage Control Program: Efforts to Protect Livestock from Predators U.S General Accounting Office Nov 2001 Wildlife Services Program: Information on Activities to Manage Wildlife Damage Washington, D.C.: GAO Wendy Keefover-Ring WOLVES AND ETHICAL PERSPECTIVES Religious and ethical perceptions of wolves are unsurprisingly intertwined with the ways that wolves come into conflict or cohesion with human interests From ravenous beasts, to protective gods, to wildlife superstars, wolves have played various symbolic roles throughout history Because the human imagination is entangled with the physical landscape, wolves have alternatively been decimated, persecuted, respected, or allowed to flourish based on the degree to which humans have considered them a part of their moral and sacred communities Wolves as Kin As a species particularly well equipped for symbolic thought, humans have long looked to other animals for their behavioral cues, adapting and adopting various nonhuman animals as social models For many small-scale societies that depended on coordinated hunting as a means of subsistence, wolves were often treated with admiration and seen as teachers and masters of the hunt Recognition of the similarities between wolves and humans was often reflected positively through a kinship-based ethic and oral narratives describing the manner in which wolves aided hunters, religious specialists, and warriors in times of need Kinship relations, based on physical proximity and mythic importance (the